YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2025:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 001::page 04024323-1
    Author:
    Neeraj Kumar
    ,
    Rakesh Kumar
    DOI: 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-10283
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The stone column encasement is a widespread ground improvement technique that effectively improves the engineering characteristics of weak and compressible soils with excessive settlement problems under vertical loadings. Despite the extensive use of stone columns, the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with various geosynthetic encasement configurations under cyclic loading conditions remains unexplored. This study aimed to understand the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with dual-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (DLGESCs), single-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (SLGESCs), and ordinary stone columns (OSCs) under cyclic loading conditions. The effects of cyclic loading amplitude, frequency, and geosynthetic encasement on settlement behavior were investigated using PLAXIS-3D (version 21) software with the hardening soil small constitutive model, and geosynthetic encasements with variable axial stiffness and tensile strength were studied. The study results indicated that higher cyclic loading amplitudes and frequencies increase the settlement of the stone column. DLGESC outperformed SLGESC with a 5.8%–11.2% settlement reduction, while SLGESC reduced settlement by 40.9%–47.8% compared to OSC. Geosynthetic GT3 (800 kN/m axial stiffness, 70 kN/m tensile strength) decreased settlement by 7.6%–13.6% compared to GT1. This research emphasizes ground improvement techniques and demonstrates the way DLGESC reduces settlement and improves structure stability on stone column–reinforced sandy soils. This study can help design resilient and stable foundations for pavements, railroad tracks, and offshore structures under cyclic vertical loading characteristics and suitable encasement configurations.
    • Download: (1.679Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305094
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNeeraj Kumar
    contributor authorRakesh Kumar
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:37:39Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:37:39Z
    date copyright11/8/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherIJGNAI.GMENG-10283.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305094
    description abstractThe stone column encasement is a widespread ground improvement technique that effectively improves the engineering characteristics of weak and compressible soils with excessive settlement problems under vertical loadings. Despite the extensive use of stone columns, the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with various geosynthetic encasement configurations under cyclic loading conditions remains unexplored. This study aimed to understand the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with dual-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (DLGESCs), single-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (SLGESCs), and ordinary stone columns (OSCs) under cyclic loading conditions. The effects of cyclic loading amplitude, frequency, and geosynthetic encasement on settlement behavior were investigated using PLAXIS-3D (version 21) software with the hardening soil small constitutive model, and geosynthetic encasements with variable axial stiffness and tensile strength were studied. The study results indicated that higher cyclic loading amplitudes and frequencies increase the settlement of the stone column. DLGESC outperformed SLGESC with a 5.8%–11.2% settlement reduction, while SLGESC reduced settlement by 40.9%–47.8% compared to OSC. Geosynthetic GT3 (800 kN/m axial stiffness, 70 kN/m tensile strength) decreased settlement by 7.6%–13.6% compared to GT1. This research emphasizes ground improvement techniques and demonstrates the way DLGESC reduces settlement and improves structure stability on stone column–reinforced sandy soils. This study can help design resilient and stable foundations for pavements, railroad tracks, and offshore structures under cyclic vertical loading characteristics and suitable encasement configurations.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePerformance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume25
    journal issue1
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-10283
    journal fristpage04024323-1
    journal lastpage04024323-12
    page12
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2025:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian