YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Allocation of Environmental Responsibilities in the Prefabricated Construction Supply Chain: Exploring the Influence of Government Subsidies

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 011::page 04024167-1
    Author:
    Qingrui Tan
    ,
    Meng Ye
    DOI: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15018
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Prefabricated construction has shifted a portion of environmental responsibilities (ERs) from on-site to off-site, prompting a focus on the entire supply chain. As an issue emerging alongside the prefabricated construction, ERs are yet to be clearly allocated along the supply chain. This study aims to explore the optimal allocation of ERs between the agents involved in a prefabricated construction supply chain (PCSC), considering two distinct types of government subsidies, namely, subsidies based on ER levels (EL subsidy) and subsidies based on ER incremental costs (EC subsidy). Additionally, it aims to compare the influence of two types of government subsidies on this allocation process. A three-stage supply-chain Stackelberg model involving the government, a supplier, and a contractor was established to analyze their optimal decisions and a numerical analysis based on a case was further exploited to validate the results. The study revealed a positive correlation between ER levels of the entire supply chain and the ER managerial efficiency of both agents under each type of subsidy. The ER allocation between the two agents varied depending on the subsidy type. With EL subsidies, the allocation of one’s ER level was contingent on its own ER managerial efficiency, while under EC subsidies, the optimal allocation of ERs between the two agents was equal. No subsidy could simultaneously render both agents more profitable than the alternative subsidy, but optimal profits were largely determined by the ER managerial efficiency of the involved agents. By comparing subsidy effectiveness indicators, it was found that EL subsidies are deemed more beneficial for the construction environment than EC subsidies. The findings can serve as a valuable reference for government authorities to incentivize ER behaviors and help enterprises in the supply chain achieve a win-win situation.
    • Download: (751.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Allocation of Environmental Responsibilities in the Prefabricated Construction Supply Chain: Exploring the Influence of Government Subsidies

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304809
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQingrui Tan
    contributor authorMeng Ye
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:28:58Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:28:58Z
    date copyright9/13/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJCEMD4.COENG-15018.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304809
    description abstractPrefabricated construction has shifted a portion of environmental responsibilities (ERs) from on-site to off-site, prompting a focus on the entire supply chain. As an issue emerging alongside the prefabricated construction, ERs are yet to be clearly allocated along the supply chain. This study aims to explore the optimal allocation of ERs between the agents involved in a prefabricated construction supply chain (PCSC), considering two distinct types of government subsidies, namely, subsidies based on ER levels (EL subsidy) and subsidies based on ER incremental costs (EC subsidy). Additionally, it aims to compare the influence of two types of government subsidies on this allocation process. A three-stage supply-chain Stackelberg model involving the government, a supplier, and a contractor was established to analyze their optimal decisions and a numerical analysis based on a case was further exploited to validate the results. The study revealed a positive correlation between ER levels of the entire supply chain and the ER managerial efficiency of both agents under each type of subsidy. The ER allocation between the two agents varied depending on the subsidy type. With EL subsidies, the allocation of one’s ER level was contingent on its own ER managerial efficiency, while under EC subsidies, the optimal allocation of ERs between the two agents was equal. No subsidy could simultaneously render both agents more profitable than the alternative subsidy, but optimal profits were largely determined by the ER managerial efficiency of the involved agents. By comparing subsidy effectiveness indicators, it was found that EL subsidies are deemed more beneficial for the construction environment than EC subsidies. The findings can serve as a valuable reference for government authorities to incentivize ER behaviors and help enterprises in the supply chain achieve a win-win situation.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAllocation of Environmental Responsibilities in the Prefabricated Construction Supply Chain: Exploring the Influence of Government Subsidies
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15018
    journal fristpage04024167-1
    journal lastpage04024167-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian