YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation Model for Crack Detection with Deep Learning: Improved Confusion Matrix Based on Linear Features

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 003::page 04024210-1
    Author:
    Ching-Lung Fan
    DOI: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14976
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Damage due to cracking can be detected through either manual visual methods or machine vision techniques for early prevention and maintenance. In recent years, image-based deep learning methods have emerged as potent tools for automatic crack detection. In this study, five deep learning object detection algorithms—faster R-CNN, single-shot detector (SSD), You Only Look Once (YOLO) v3 and v8, and RetinaNet—were systematically compared, and the results were analyzed. Object detection involves the generation of bounding boxes of various sizes for objects of interest. Because cracks are thin and small and thus difficult to capture in a unique bounding box, redundant measurements are common, but they compromise the accuracy and consistency of the model. Therefore, an improved confusion matrix based on linear features was employed in this study to evaluate the crack detection performance of the five object detection algorithms. In evaluation experiments, the overall accuracy levels of SSD were 90.6% on visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) images, indicating effective concrete crack detection performance. Notably, SSD excels in cases involving small cracks and data imbalance, thus demonstrating a high level of model stability. This comparative analysis of the performances of different deep learning algorithms in crack detection contributes to the formulation of methods for automatic damage detection.
    • Download: (3.795Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation Model for Crack Detection with Deep Learning: Improved Confusion Matrix Based on Linear Features

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304518
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChing-Lung Fan
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:20:38Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:20:38Z
    date copyright12/24/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJCEMD4.COENG-14976.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304518
    description abstractDamage due to cracking can be detected through either manual visual methods or machine vision techniques for early prevention and maintenance. In recent years, image-based deep learning methods have emerged as potent tools for automatic crack detection. In this study, five deep learning object detection algorithms—faster R-CNN, single-shot detector (SSD), You Only Look Once (YOLO) v3 and v8, and RetinaNet—were systematically compared, and the results were analyzed. Object detection involves the generation of bounding boxes of various sizes for objects of interest. Because cracks are thin and small and thus difficult to capture in a unique bounding box, redundant measurements are common, but they compromise the accuracy and consistency of the model. Therefore, an improved confusion matrix based on linear features was employed in this study to evaluate the crack detection performance of the five object detection algorithms. In evaluation experiments, the overall accuracy levels of SSD were 90.6% on visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) images, indicating effective concrete crack detection performance. Notably, SSD excels in cases involving small cracks and data imbalance, thus demonstrating a high level of model stability. This comparative analysis of the performances of different deep learning algorithms in crack detection contributes to the formulation of methods for automatic damage detection.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluation Model for Crack Detection with Deep Learning: Improved Confusion Matrix Based on Linear Features
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14976
    journal fristpage04024210-1
    journal lastpage04024210-16
    page16
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian