YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Velocity Distributions in Open Channels and the Calculation of Discharge

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002::page 04025002-1
    Author:
    John D. Fenton
    DOI: 10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10426
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The accurate representation and integration of velocity measurements in open channels is important in irrigation and river engineering. The traditional approach for velocity is to use an approximate physical theory, giving the well-known logarithmic formulas, plus less well-known correction formulas in terms of mathematical functions. The approach is criticized here as being too prescriptive and not capable of systematic improvement or generalization. A different paradigm is suggested, oriented toward practice and numerical solution. The velocity is written as a polynomial, a series of monomial terms, in terms of the relative height of a point above the bed. In the first contribution it is raised to a fractional power, mimicking the actual shear flow in a stream where velocity goes to zero on the bed but with a large gradient. Polynomials with just two extra terms can describe well a number of laboratory and field measurements. It is computationally better, however, to use the monomials rearranged as Chebyshev polynomials. This is simply done and can be used as a means of approximating several measurements at arbitrary points to give an accurate depth-averaged velocity. Using the polynomial approximation, the accuracy of standard hydrographic and hydrometric methods is then examined. The well-known two-point 0.2/0.8 method of integration is surprisingly proved to be accurate to within 1% for any smoothly varying quantity. Such high accuracy has been found experimentally; what is noteworthy is its general theoretical validity—and its simplicity. Procedures for integrating across a stream are then considered and it is shown that a common approach, the mean section method, is not correct. Then the polynomial approximation method is generalized to two dimensions to give a method for the calculation of discharge also for arbitrary distributions of velocity measurement points in general cross sections. The velocity distribution in an open channel can be simply and accurately approximated by a polynomial in terms of the local height above the bed expressed as a fraction of the total depth. The first polynomial term is a simple fractional power of that quantity, which mimics the well-known behavior that as the velocity goes to zero on the bed, the gradient becomes large. It is computationally better for other polynomial terms, instead of just integer powers, to use combinations of them in the form of special functions, for which formulas are given. Then, if several velocity measurements are made on a vertical line, they can be approximated using optimization methods. To calculate discharge accurately, such a procedure is actually not necessary. A surprising and general proof is given that any smoothly varying physical quantity can be integrated to within 1% accuracy using just the mean of values at 20% and 80% of the domain. This has been determined empirically in hydrography and hydrometry and is standard practice. The simplicity and accuracy of the procedure is most fortunate. Finally, the polynomial method is extended to two dimensions, enabling the approximation of arbitrary measurements of the velocity field and the determination of discharge in any river or canal.
    • Download: (748.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Velocity Distributions in Open Channels and the Calculation of Discharge

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304120
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJohn D. Fenton
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:09:57Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:09:57Z
    date copyright1/10/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJIDEDH.IRENG-10426.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304120
    description abstractThe accurate representation and integration of velocity measurements in open channels is important in irrigation and river engineering. The traditional approach for velocity is to use an approximate physical theory, giving the well-known logarithmic formulas, plus less well-known correction formulas in terms of mathematical functions. The approach is criticized here as being too prescriptive and not capable of systematic improvement or generalization. A different paradigm is suggested, oriented toward practice and numerical solution. The velocity is written as a polynomial, a series of monomial terms, in terms of the relative height of a point above the bed. In the first contribution it is raised to a fractional power, mimicking the actual shear flow in a stream where velocity goes to zero on the bed but with a large gradient. Polynomials with just two extra terms can describe well a number of laboratory and field measurements. It is computationally better, however, to use the monomials rearranged as Chebyshev polynomials. This is simply done and can be used as a means of approximating several measurements at arbitrary points to give an accurate depth-averaged velocity. Using the polynomial approximation, the accuracy of standard hydrographic and hydrometric methods is then examined. The well-known two-point 0.2/0.8 method of integration is surprisingly proved to be accurate to within 1% for any smoothly varying quantity. Such high accuracy has been found experimentally; what is noteworthy is its general theoretical validity—and its simplicity. Procedures for integrating across a stream are then considered and it is shown that a common approach, the mean section method, is not correct. Then the polynomial approximation method is generalized to two dimensions to give a method for the calculation of discharge also for arbitrary distributions of velocity measurement points in general cross sections. The velocity distribution in an open channel can be simply and accurately approximated by a polynomial in terms of the local height above the bed expressed as a fraction of the total depth. The first polynomial term is a simple fractional power of that quantity, which mimics the well-known behavior that as the velocity goes to zero on the bed, the gradient becomes large. It is computationally better for other polynomial terms, instead of just integer powers, to use combinations of them in the form of special functions, for which formulas are given. Then, if several velocity measurements are made on a vertical line, they can be approximated using optimization methods. To calculate discharge accurately, such a procedure is actually not necessary. A surprising and general proof is given that any smoothly varying physical quantity can be integrated to within 1% accuracy using just the mean of values at 20% and 80% of the domain. This has been determined empirically in hydrography and hydrometry and is standard practice. The simplicity and accuracy of the procedure is most fortunate. Finally, the polynomial method is extended to two dimensions, enabling the approximation of arbitrary measurements of the velocity field and the determination of discharge in any river or canal.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleVelocity Distributions in Open Channels and the Calculation of Discharge
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10426
    journal fristpage04025002-1
    journal lastpage04025002-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian