YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessment of Urban Rail Transit System Resilience Based on a Cloud Matter-Element Model

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002::page 04024110-1
    Author:
    Dexin Mu
    ,
    Zhongyi Zuo
    ,
    Chunxing Mao
    ,
    Guangchuan Yang
    DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8756
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: To ensure the operational reliability and service quality of urban rail transit systems, it is crucial to assess the resilience of urban rail transit reasonably when subjected to disruptions. This paper divides the resilience of an urban rail transit system into absorption, buffering, and recovery phases according to the characteristics of resilience changes, based on which a resilience evaluation index was developed. Then the order relation analysis-criteria important through intercriteria correlation (G1-CRITIC) method was employed for subjective-objective combination weighting to determine the comprehensive weights of the evaluation indexes. After that, a cloud model was combined with a matter-element theory to construct a cloud matter-element assessment model, which aimed at addressing the fuzziness and randomness that may occur during the assessment process. The proposed model was applied to the Dalian, China, urban rail transit system as a case study. The resilience assessment was conducted based on four quantitative indicators acquired from field surveys and scores of 16 qualitative indicators obtained through expert interviews. Results showed that the maximum comprehensive membership degree of resilience for Dalian urban rail transit system is 0.3074, which was rated as having moderate resilience. Among the secondary indicators in the absorption phase, transit line substitutability fell under the extremely weak resilience grade, with a substitutability rate accounting for 26.9% of the total operational length of transit lines. The research findings have the potential to provide urban rail transit operators and planners with a clearer view of the vulnerable routes or stations, facilitating the adoption of proactive measures to enhance the system’s ability to withstand disruptions. Moreover, the case study demonstrated that the cloud matter-element combination model is highly applicable for assessing the resilience of urban rail transit systems.
    • Download: (3.477Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Assessment of Urban Rail Transit System Resilience Based on a Cloud Matter-Element Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304086
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDexin Mu
    contributor authorZhongyi Zuo
    contributor authorChunxing Mao
    contributor authorGuangchuan Yang
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:08:52Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:08:52Z
    date copyright12/11/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJTEPBS.TEENG-8756.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304086
    description abstractTo ensure the operational reliability and service quality of urban rail transit systems, it is crucial to assess the resilience of urban rail transit reasonably when subjected to disruptions. This paper divides the resilience of an urban rail transit system into absorption, buffering, and recovery phases according to the characteristics of resilience changes, based on which a resilience evaluation index was developed. Then the order relation analysis-criteria important through intercriteria correlation (G1-CRITIC) method was employed for subjective-objective combination weighting to determine the comprehensive weights of the evaluation indexes. After that, a cloud model was combined with a matter-element theory to construct a cloud matter-element assessment model, which aimed at addressing the fuzziness and randomness that may occur during the assessment process. The proposed model was applied to the Dalian, China, urban rail transit system as a case study. The resilience assessment was conducted based on four quantitative indicators acquired from field surveys and scores of 16 qualitative indicators obtained through expert interviews. Results showed that the maximum comprehensive membership degree of resilience for Dalian urban rail transit system is 0.3074, which was rated as having moderate resilience. Among the secondary indicators in the absorption phase, transit line substitutability fell under the extremely weak resilience grade, with a substitutability rate accounting for 26.9% of the total operational length of transit lines. The research findings have the potential to provide urban rail transit operators and planners with a clearer view of the vulnerable routes or stations, facilitating the adoption of proactive measures to enhance the system’s ability to withstand disruptions. Moreover, the case study demonstrated that the cloud matter-element combination model is highly applicable for assessing the resilience of urban rail transit systems.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAssessment of Urban Rail Transit System Resilience Based on a Cloud Matter-Element Model
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8756
    journal fristpage04024110-1
    journal lastpage04024110-17
    page17
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian