YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sustainability Assessment of Fly Ash, Lime Sludge, and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag–Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Kaolin Clay

    Source: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2025:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 002::page 04024048-1
    Author:
    Adedeji A. Disu
    ,
    Prabir Kolay
    DOI: 10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1348
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sustainability benefits of Class F fly ash (FA), lime sludge (LS), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)-based geopolymer-stabilized Edgar plastic kaolin (EPK) clay using the sustainability index (ISus) approach. Geotechnical engineering operations usually precede most infrastructural projects, making pavement construction an integral contributor to various environmental effects, due to the production of enormous quantities of greenhouse gas emissions through soil stabilization activities. To nip these concerns in the bud, effective integration of these environmental implications must be achieved during the geotechnical planning phase. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method was used to assess a wide range of environmental effects of a project, from raw material procurement, manufacturing, transportation, construction, and maintenance to final disposal. It is a well-recognized tool for designing environmentally sustainable projects. Experimental results from the geopolymer-stabilized EPK clay showed a notable improvement in unconfined compressive strength of the geopolymer-stabilized clay with 15% (FA + LS) and 5% (FA + GGBS) contents of up to 697% and 464%, respectively, after 28 days of curing at elevated temperature, 70°C. The sustainability index (ISus) of geopolymer and lime treatment methods was analyzed based on the concept of environmental, resource consumption, and socioeconomic concerns, which quantifies the sustainability through greenhouse gas emission, environmental impacts, and the cost of utilizing FA, LS, and GGBS in soil stabilization compared with traditional lime. LCA was conducted for traditional lime treatment, FA-LS, and FA-GGBS geopolymer-stabilized subgrades to determine the most sustainable treatment method. From the sustainability analysis, using FA, LS, and GGBS as geopolymer stabilizers for kaolin clay reduced the global warming potential by 98.03% and 77.55% over the traditional lime stabilizers at 8% dosage. More importantly, results from the sustainability index (ISus) computations showed that FA-LS (ISus = 12.88) and FA-GGBS (ISus = 29.72) geopolymer treatment methods of EPK clay subgrade soils are more sustainable alternatives compared to the traditional lime (ISus = 48.07) treatment method.
    • Download: (834.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Sustainability Assessment of Fly Ash, Lime Sludge, and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag–Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Kaolin Clay

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304012
    Collections
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAdedeji A. Disu
    contributor authorPrabir Kolay
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:06:52Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:06:52Z
    date copyright12/31/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJHTRBP.HZENG-1348.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304012
    description abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the sustainability benefits of Class F fly ash (FA), lime sludge (LS), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)-based geopolymer-stabilized Edgar plastic kaolin (EPK) clay using the sustainability index (ISus) approach. Geotechnical engineering operations usually precede most infrastructural projects, making pavement construction an integral contributor to various environmental effects, due to the production of enormous quantities of greenhouse gas emissions through soil stabilization activities. To nip these concerns in the bud, effective integration of these environmental implications must be achieved during the geotechnical planning phase. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method was used to assess a wide range of environmental effects of a project, from raw material procurement, manufacturing, transportation, construction, and maintenance to final disposal. It is a well-recognized tool for designing environmentally sustainable projects. Experimental results from the geopolymer-stabilized EPK clay showed a notable improvement in unconfined compressive strength of the geopolymer-stabilized clay with 15% (FA + LS) and 5% (FA + GGBS) contents of up to 697% and 464%, respectively, after 28 days of curing at elevated temperature, 70°C. The sustainability index (ISus) of geopolymer and lime treatment methods was analyzed based on the concept of environmental, resource consumption, and socioeconomic concerns, which quantifies the sustainability through greenhouse gas emission, environmental impacts, and the cost of utilizing FA, LS, and GGBS in soil stabilization compared with traditional lime. LCA was conducted for traditional lime treatment, FA-LS, and FA-GGBS geopolymer-stabilized subgrades to determine the most sustainable treatment method. From the sustainability analysis, using FA, LS, and GGBS as geopolymer stabilizers for kaolin clay reduced the global warming potential by 98.03% and 77.55% over the traditional lime stabilizers at 8% dosage. More importantly, results from the sustainability index (ISus) computations showed that FA-LS (ISus = 12.88) and FA-GGBS (ISus = 29.72) geopolymer treatment methods of EPK clay subgrade soils are more sustainable alternatives compared to the traditional lime (ISus = 48.07) treatment method.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSustainability Assessment of Fly Ash, Lime Sludge, and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag–Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Kaolin Clay
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume29
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    identifier doi10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1348
    journal fristpage04024048-1
    journal lastpage04024048-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2025:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian