Study on Spatial Difference and Its Convergence of Urban Assessment: Based on 286 Cities in ChinaSource: Journal of Urban Planning and Development:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004::page 04024053-1DOI: 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-5162Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Urban assessment is an important basis for judging the sustainable development capability of cities. This study constructs an urban assessment index system from six aspects: health and comfort, ecological livability, convenient transportation, cleanliness and orderliness, diversity and inclusiveness, and innovation and vitality. Based on the spatial panel data of 286 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2021, the spatial differences that exist in urban appraisal among the three major regions of China and their convergence are investigated. The study shows the following: First, the study reveals a significant improvement in the level of city governance across the country, with a gradual reduction in absolute differences. Second, the overall differences in the urban assessment scores of individual cities in China have been decreasing year by year. Intraregional differences are smaller than interregional differences, with the east-central region showing the largest interregional difference. Third, regarding σ convergence, the evolutionary trends of city governance levels in the nation and the eastern, central, and western parts of China are somewhat turbulent but show significant σ convergence characteristics overall. Absolute spatial β-convergence coefficients in the nation and the eastern, central, and western parts of China are significantly smaller than 0. Additionally, there are conditional β-convergence trends in city governance in the nation and each city in the eastern, central, and western parts of China.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Yueting Shao | |
| contributor author | Heng Gu | |
| contributor author | Pengzhen Liu | |
| contributor author | Fengyu Qi | |
| date accessioned | 2025-04-20T10:06:25Z | |
| date available | 2025-04-20T10:06:25Z | |
| date copyright | 9/24/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2024 | |
| identifier other | JUPDDM.UPENG-5162.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303999 | |
| description abstract | Urban assessment is an important basis for judging the sustainable development capability of cities. This study constructs an urban assessment index system from six aspects: health and comfort, ecological livability, convenient transportation, cleanliness and orderliness, diversity and inclusiveness, and innovation and vitality. Based on the spatial panel data of 286 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2021, the spatial differences that exist in urban appraisal among the three major regions of China and their convergence are investigated. The study shows the following: First, the study reveals a significant improvement in the level of city governance across the country, with a gradual reduction in absolute differences. Second, the overall differences in the urban assessment scores of individual cities in China have been decreasing year by year. Intraregional differences are smaller than interregional differences, with the east-central region showing the largest interregional difference. Third, regarding σ convergence, the evolutionary trends of city governance levels in the nation and the eastern, central, and western parts of China are somewhat turbulent but show significant σ convergence characteristics overall. Absolute spatial β-convergence coefficients in the nation and the eastern, central, and western parts of China are significantly smaller than 0. Additionally, there are conditional β-convergence trends in city governance in the nation and each city in the eastern, central, and western parts of China. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Study on Spatial Difference and Its Convergence of Urban Assessment: Based on 286 Cities in China | |
| type | Journal Article | |
| journal volume | 150 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Urban Planning and Development | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-5162 | |
| journal fristpage | 04024053-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 04024053-11 | |
| page | 11 | |
| tree | Journal of Urban Planning and Development:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |