Social Washing in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction FirmsSource: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 041 ):;issue: 001::page 04024060-1DOI: 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6095Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The growing importance of social sustainability fosters firms to communicate their social impact, e.g., through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting. Unfortunately, firms’ actions are often not consistent with their communication. When action and communication on social sustainability are incongruent, social washing emerges. This paper aims to provide an exploratory analysis, based on multiple case studies, to investigate the dimensions and practices of social washing in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms. The results reveal that the main social washing practices in AEC are misleading assessment of impacts, cherry-picking, inadequate or absent involvement of the local community, and concealment of modern slavery. We propose a framework for operationalizing the analysis of social washing practices in AEC firms. Finally, we provide an overview of the dimensions and practices of social washing, laying the groundwork for future studies on the topic.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Giorgio Locatelli | |
contributor author | Ilaria Zagaria | |
contributor author | Giacomo Dei | |
contributor author | Tristano Sainati | |
date accessioned | 2025-04-20T10:04:14Z | |
date available | 2025-04-20T10:04:14Z | |
date copyright | 10/7/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2025 | |
identifier other | JMENEA.MEENG-6095.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303929 | |
description abstract | The growing importance of social sustainability fosters firms to communicate their social impact, e.g., through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting. Unfortunately, firms’ actions are often not consistent with their communication. When action and communication on social sustainability are incongruent, social washing emerges. This paper aims to provide an exploratory analysis, based on multiple case studies, to investigate the dimensions and practices of social washing in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms. The results reveal that the main social washing practices in AEC are misleading assessment of impacts, cherry-picking, inadequate or absent involvement of the local community, and concealment of modern slavery. We propose a framework for operationalizing the analysis of social washing practices in AEC firms. Finally, we provide an overview of the dimensions and practices of social washing, laying the groundwork for future studies on the topic. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Social Washing in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Firms | |
type | Journal Article | |
journal volume | 41 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Management in Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6095 | |
journal fristpage | 04024060-1 | |
journal lastpage | 04024060-14 | |
page | 14 | |
tree | Journal of Management in Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 041 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |