YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rapid Assessment of Concrete Resistance to Physical Sulfate Attack: Effects of the Binder, the Water-to-Binder Ratio, and the Entrained Air

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 002::page 04024507-1
    Author:
    Redha Esselami
    ,
    Arezki Tagnit-Hamou
    ,
    William Wilson
    DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17418
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Concrete surfaces in the evaporation zone above sulfate-rich soils are subject to severe damage from scaling. Such a physical sulfate attack (PSA) on concrete is a consequence of a cyclic regime between hot-dry and cold-wet environments, during which sodium sulfate crystals expand within the porous media (binder matrix or aggregate) and exert high pressure on the pore walls. Currently, no accepted standard exists for evaluating the resistance of concrete to the PSA phenomenon. In this study, an accelerated physical sulfate attack test protocol was used to determine the effect of blended cement and water-to-binder ratio on concrete resistance to PSA. The testing included a preconditioning protocol for presaturating concrete specimens in a 10% sodium sulfate solution for 15 days, with heat-drying specimens at 50°C before and after immersion. Specimens were then partially immersed in a 10% sodium sulfate solution and subjected to a cyclic regime composed of hot-dry [40°C, 30% RH] and cold-wet [8°C, 85% RH] conditions for 19 h each, separated by a 4-h transition at room temperature. Silica fume (GUb-SF), limestone (GUL), and slag (GUb-S) blended cements were used and compared with general use (GU) cement. A fifth binder (GUL-GP) contained 20% glass powder as a partial replacement of the limestone—portland cement was also used. Three different water-to-binder ratios were used for each binder: 0.35, 0.45, and 0.55. As expected, mixes with lower water-to-binder ratios showed the best performance against PSA, i.e., the lowest mass loss after 15 cycles of exposure (30 days). GUb-SF cement improved the resistance of mixtures with a high water-to-binder ratio compared to GU mixtures. Contrary to silica fume and slag, limestone reduced the resistance of concrete to PSA and showed the highest rate of visual damage for all water-to-binder ratios.
    • Download: (3.190Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rapid Assessment of Concrete Resistance to Physical Sulfate Attack: Effects of the Binder, the Water-to-Binder Ratio, and the Entrained Air

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303793
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRedha Esselami
    contributor authorArezki Tagnit-Hamou
    contributor authorWilliam Wilson
    date accessioned2025-04-20T09:59:32Z
    date available2025-04-20T09:59:32Z
    date copyright11/28/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJMCEE7.MTENG-17418.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303793
    description abstractConcrete surfaces in the evaporation zone above sulfate-rich soils are subject to severe damage from scaling. Such a physical sulfate attack (PSA) on concrete is a consequence of a cyclic regime between hot-dry and cold-wet environments, during which sodium sulfate crystals expand within the porous media (binder matrix or aggregate) and exert high pressure on the pore walls. Currently, no accepted standard exists for evaluating the resistance of concrete to the PSA phenomenon. In this study, an accelerated physical sulfate attack test protocol was used to determine the effect of blended cement and water-to-binder ratio on concrete resistance to PSA. The testing included a preconditioning protocol for presaturating concrete specimens in a 10% sodium sulfate solution for 15 days, with heat-drying specimens at 50°C before and after immersion. Specimens were then partially immersed in a 10% sodium sulfate solution and subjected to a cyclic regime composed of hot-dry [40°C, 30% RH] and cold-wet [8°C, 85% RH] conditions for 19 h each, separated by a 4-h transition at room temperature. Silica fume (GUb-SF), limestone (GUL), and slag (GUb-S) blended cements were used and compared with general use (GU) cement. A fifth binder (GUL-GP) contained 20% glass powder as a partial replacement of the limestone—portland cement was also used. Three different water-to-binder ratios were used for each binder: 0.35, 0.45, and 0.55. As expected, mixes with lower water-to-binder ratios showed the best performance against PSA, i.e., the lowest mass loss after 15 cycles of exposure (30 days). GUb-SF cement improved the resistance of mixtures with a high water-to-binder ratio compared to GU mixtures. Contrary to silica fume and slag, limestone reduced the resistance of concrete to PSA and showed the highest rate of visual damage for all water-to-binder ratios.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRapid Assessment of Concrete Resistance to Physical Sulfate Attack: Effects of the Binder, the Water-to-Binder Ratio, and the Entrained Air
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume37
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17418
    journal fristpage04024507-1
    journal lastpage04024507-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian