Show simple item record

contributor authorPrzytarski, Pawel J.
contributor authorLengani, Davide
contributor authorSimoni, Daniele
contributor authorWheeler, Andrew P. S.
date accessioned2024-12-24T18:43:37Z
date available2024-12-24T18:43:37Z
date copyright5/8/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2024
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherturbo_146_10_101008.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302633
description abstractIn this article, we study the role of turbulence transport on loss prediction using high fidelity scale-resolving simulations. For this purpose, we use eight high-fidelity simulation datasets and compute flux of entropy and stagnation pressure transport equation budgets for all the cases. We find that under certain unsteady inflow conditions, the stagnation pressure coefficient is not a reliable loss metric even at low Mach number conditions. This is due to the turbulence transport terms. The impact of these terms, typically assumed to be negligible, made stagnation pressure loss coefficient underpredict loss from 0% to over 40% when compared to entropy loss coefficient for cases considered here. This effect was most pronounced for the cases with highly unsteady inflow conditions and at low Reynolds numbers.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Role of Turbulence Transport in Mechanical Energy Budgets
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4065287
journal fristpage101008-1
journal lastpage101008-10
page10
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record