Strategies for Developing High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete with High Early-Age Strength for Precast ApplicationsSource: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 010::page 04024335-1Author:Zacharia Sao
,
Gopakumar Kaladharan
,
Jinyoung Yoon
,
Chiranjeevi Reddy Kamasani
,
Farshad Rajabipour
,
Matthew J. Gombeda
DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18004Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Partial replacement of portland cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash, is an effective strategy for improving durability and reducing the CO2 footprint of concrete. However, using high-volume fly ash (HVFA) binders in precast and prestressed concrete is currently limited; largely due to reduced early-age strength development that impedes rapid production and prestressing of precast concrete. To investigate and address this challenge, HVFA mortars with a minimum of 40% fly ash by mass of cementitious materials were developed and tested in this study. Two fresh fly ashes (an ASTM C618 Class F and a Class C) and a landfilled fly ash (Class F) were included. Various strategies for improving the early strength were evaluated, including gypsum optimization, chemical accelerators, steam curing, use of CSA cements, and adding other reactive SCMs like silica fume, calcined clay, and slag cement. Steam curing and the use of CSA cement at high dosages (40% of total binder) were found to be the most successful strategies across all three fly ashes. Additionally, significant improvements were observed with gypsum optimization (for Class C fly ash) and the use of accelerators (for Class F fly ashes), and these strategies are likely to be more feasible considering later-age strength and economic viability. Interestingly, HVFA mixtures made with the landfilled fly ash used in this study were able to achieve high early strengths with water-to-cementitious materials ratio adjustment alone. These HVFA mixtures were also found to be less responsive to accelerators when compared to the fresh Class F fly ash, highlighting an important distinction between the materials despite the similarity in chemical composition.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Zacharia Sao | |
| contributor author | Gopakumar Kaladharan | |
| contributor author | Jinyoung Yoon | |
| contributor author | Chiranjeevi Reddy Kamasani | |
| contributor author | Farshad Rajabipour | |
| contributor author | Matthew J. Gombeda | |
| date accessioned | 2024-12-24T10:40:14Z | |
| date available | 2024-12-24T10:40:14Z | |
| date copyright | 10/1/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2024 | |
| identifier other | JMCEE7.MTENG-18004.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4299341 | |
| description abstract | Partial replacement of portland cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash, is an effective strategy for improving durability and reducing the CO2 footprint of concrete. However, using high-volume fly ash (HVFA) binders in precast and prestressed concrete is currently limited; largely due to reduced early-age strength development that impedes rapid production and prestressing of precast concrete. To investigate and address this challenge, HVFA mortars with a minimum of 40% fly ash by mass of cementitious materials were developed and tested in this study. Two fresh fly ashes (an ASTM C618 Class F and a Class C) and a landfilled fly ash (Class F) were included. Various strategies for improving the early strength were evaluated, including gypsum optimization, chemical accelerators, steam curing, use of CSA cements, and adding other reactive SCMs like silica fume, calcined clay, and slag cement. Steam curing and the use of CSA cement at high dosages (40% of total binder) were found to be the most successful strategies across all three fly ashes. Additionally, significant improvements were observed with gypsum optimization (for Class C fly ash) and the use of accelerators (for Class F fly ashes), and these strategies are likely to be more feasible considering later-age strength and economic viability. Interestingly, HVFA mixtures made with the landfilled fly ash used in this study were able to achieve high early strengths with water-to-cementitious materials ratio adjustment alone. These HVFA mixtures were also found to be less responsive to accelerators when compared to the fresh Class F fly ash, highlighting an important distinction between the materials despite the similarity in chemical composition. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Strategies for Developing High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete with High Early-Age Strength for Precast Applications | |
| type | Journal Article | |
| journal volume | 36 | |
| journal issue | 10 | |
| journal title | Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18004 | |
| journal fristpage | 04024335-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 04024335-13 | |
| page | 13 | |
| tree | Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 010 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |