YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Compression Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber Wall Panels with Different Reinforcement Mechanisms

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 008::page 04024223-1
    Author:
    Arijit Sinha
    ,
    Andre R. Barbosa
    ,
    Tu X. Ho
    ,
    Reid B. Zimmerman
    ,
    Eric McDonnell
    DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17005
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The main objective of this work is to characterize the stress–strain relationship of cross-laminated timber (CLT) wall panels when loaded in compression and how different confinement mechanisms provide compression reinforcement for the CLT panels. CLT crushing tests were performed to define the behavior of CLT under compression up to the failure point, defined here as the strain at which the gross stress falls by 20% from the peak value. Testing included monotonic uniform compression experiments of five-ply CLT with specimens that were 0.457 m wide by 1.52 m long. The motion of the specimens perpendicular to loading direction was restrained at midlength to prevent buckling. Twelve specimens were tested, including six bare CLT specimens and six reinforced specimens of CLT—three with self-tapping screws while the other three with self-tapping screws and an additional U-shape steel plate at the bottom of the specimens. Various damage points were observed during the tests, including (1) point at the onset of damage (through visual observation and instrumental observation) (2) point of initiation of strength degradation, (3) point at which buckling occurs, (4) point at which 25.4 mm delamination was observed, and (5) failure point. Three axial compression stress–strain models were adopted, calibrated, and compared. Results indicate that a stress–strain model combining linear and cubic functions for the elastic and softening responses, respectively, captures well the CLT inelastic behavior under compression.
    • Download: (3.199Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Compression Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber Wall Panels with Different Reinforcement Mechanisms

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4299175
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorArijit Sinha
    contributor authorAndre R. Barbosa
    contributor authorTu X. Ho
    contributor authorReid B. Zimmerman
    contributor authorEric McDonnell
    date accessioned2024-12-24T10:34:27Z
    date available2024-12-24T10:34:27Z
    date copyright8/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJMCEE7.MTENG-17005.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4299175
    description abstractThe main objective of this work is to characterize the stress–strain relationship of cross-laminated timber (CLT) wall panels when loaded in compression and how different confinement mechanisms provide compression reinforcement for the CLT panels. CLT crushing tests were performed to define the behavior of CLT under compression up to the failure point, defined here as the strain at which the gross stress falls by 20% from the peak value. Testing included monotonic uniform compression experiments of five-ply CLT with specimens that were 0.457 m wide by 1.52 m long. The motion of the specimens perpendicular to loading direction was restrained at midlength to prevent buckling. Twelve specimens were tested, including six bare CLT specimens and six reinforced specimens of CLT—three with self-tapping screws while the other three with self-tapping screws and an additional U-shape steel plate at the bottom of the specimens. Various damage points were observed during the tests, including (1) point at the onset of damage (through visual observation and instrumental observation) (2) point of initiation of strength degradation, (3) point at which buckling occurs, (4) point at which 25.4 mm delamination was observed, and (5) failure point. Three axial compression stress–strain models were adopted, calibrated, and compared. Results indicate that a stress–strain model combining linear and cubic functions for the elastic and softening responses, respectively, captures well the CLT inelastic behavior under compression.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleCompression Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber Wall Panels with Different Reinforcement Mechanisms
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume36
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17005
    journal fristpage04024223-1
    journal lastpage04024223-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian