Assessing the Effectiveness of Water-Saving Plans at the Farm and Basin Level Using Agrohydrological Modeling and Water-Accounting ApproachesSource: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004::page 04024009-1Author:Majid Delavar
,
Leila Raeisi
,
Mohammad Reza Eini
,
Saeed Morid
,
Hamid Mohammadi
,
Hamid Abbasi
DOI: 10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10110Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Lake Urmia in the northwest of Iran is one of the largest vanishing lakes in the world. Several water-saving strategies have been implemented in the lake basin over the last decade, but they are not producing efficient results. This study employed a modified version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), an agrohydrological model, to investigate the basin-scale effectiveness of some water-saving plans implemented at the farm scale. Data collected from 301 monitoring sites in the Lake Urmia basin were applied to the modified SWAT model. The modified SWAT model was used to estimate water balance components and was coupled with the Water Accounting Plus framework (WA+). Six discharge stations, crop yields, evapotranspiration, and groundwater level tables were calibrated and validated from 1987 to 2015 within the Zarrineh Rud Basin (ZRB), the most crucial subbasin in the Lake Urmia basin. Next, four individual water-saving plans—changes in irrigation management and developments in irrigation systems, changes in fertilizer type and regime, changes in the type and method of cultivation, and farm size and shape adjustments—as well as seven combinations of the water-saving plans, were applied to the agrohydrological model. The results reveal that assessing restoration plans for Lake Urmia without considering both farm and basin scales provides no reliable results. With changes in management and the development of irrigation systems, considerable differences in water withdrawal were observed. Developing irrigation systems leads to enhanced water consumption and evapotranspiration, which is expected to improve water yield and crop productivity. However, individual plans such as developments in irrigation systems cannot increase the inflow to Urmia Lake, and combined water-saving strategies can help restore the lake only to a limited extent, because the changes in inflow are not substantial.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Majid Delavar | |
contributor author | Leila Raeisi | |
contributor author | Mohammad Reza Eini | |
contributor author | Saeed Morid | |
contributor author | Hamid Mohammadi | |
contributor author | Hamid Abbasi | |
date accessioned | 2024-12-24T10:31:13Z | |
date available | 2024-12-24T10:31:13Z | |
date copyright | 8/1/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2024 | |
identifier other | JIDEDH.IRENG-10110.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4299071 | |
description abstract | Lake Urmia in the northwest of Iran is one of the largest vanishing lakes in the world. Several water-saving strategies have been implemented in the lake basin over the last decade, but they are not producing efficient results. This study employed a modified version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), an agrohydrological model, to investigate the basin-scale effectiveness of some water-saving plans implemented at the farm scale. Data collected from 301 monitoring sites in the Lake Urmia basin were applied to the modified SWAT model. The modified SWAT model was used to estimate water balance components and was coupled with the Water Accounting Plus framework (WA+). Six discharge stations, crop yields, evapotranspiration, and groundwater level tables were calibrated and validated from 1987 to 2015 within the Zarrineh Rud Basin (ZRB), the most crucial subbasin in the Lake Urmia basin. Next, four individual water-saving plans—changes in irrigation management and developments in irrigation systems, changes in fertilizer type and regime, changes in the type and method of cultivation, and farm size and shape adjustments—as well as seven combinations of the water-saving plans, were applied to the agrohydrological model. The results reveal that assessing restoration plans for Lake Urmia without considering both farm and basin scales provides no reliable results. With changes in management and the development of irrigation systems, considerable differences in water withdrawal were observed. Developing irrigation systems leads to enhanced water consumption and evapotranspiration, which is expected to improve water yield and crop productivity. However, individual plans such as developments in irrigation systems cannot increase the inflow to Urmia Lake, and combined water-saving strategies can help restore the lake only to a limited extent, because the changes in inflow are not substantial. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Assessing the Effectiveness of Water-Saving Plans at the Farm and Basin Level Using Agrohydrological Modeling and Water-Accounting Approaches | |
type | Journal Article | |
journal volume | 150 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10110 | |
journal fristpage | 04024009-1 | |
journal lastpage | 04024009-10 | |
page | 10 | |
tree | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |