YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Countermeasures for Hydraulic Loading on Bridges

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 006::page 04024039-1
    Author:
    Fahad Pervaiz
    ,
    Michelle Hummel
    ,
    Bhupendra Acharya
    ,
    Shih-Ho Chao
    ,
    Habib Ahmari
    DOI: 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6494
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Stream-crossing bridges are critical components of the surface transportation system, allowing for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. However, these bridges may be subjected to extreme hydraulic loading during flood events. To ensure the longevity and functionality of bridges, it is important to evaluate and implement effective countermeasures against hydraulic failure. This study used computational fluid dynamics modeling to quantify the magnitude of hydraulic loading on typical I-girder, box beam, and slab beam bridges in Texas under extreme flow conditions and debris damming and evaluated the efficacy of existing design guidelines for countermeasures (i.e., shear keys and earwalls) meant to resist shear failure of bridges during flood events. Results indicate that the drag force induced by hydraulic loading during a range of annual exceedance probability events (2%–0.2%) can exceed the capacity of a shear key or an earwall, especially for bridges with greater flow blockage area. Flat plate debris damming on the upstream side of the bridge causes a 46% increase in the drag force compared to the no-debris condition, resulting in a force 2.3 times the shear capacity of the shear key. For the cases where the interface shear strength is not sufficient, several approaches are recommended to increase the interface shear capacity: (1) increase the size and/or quantity of the interface shear reinforcement; (2) increase the number of shear keys; and/or (3) increase the length of the bent cap hence the length of the earwall. Findings from this work can inform the development of more robust design criteria for countermeasures to reduce the risk of hydraulic-induced failures at stream-crossing bridges.
    • Download: (1.611Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Countermeasures for Hydraulic Loading on Bridges

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298615
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFahad Pervaiz
    contributor authorMichelle Hummel
    contributor authorBhupendra Acharya
    contributor authorShih-Ho Chao
    contributor authorHabib Ahmari
    date accessioned2024-12-24T10:16:29Z
    date available2024-12-24T10:16:29Z
    date copyright6/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJBENF2.BEENG-6494.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298615
    description abstractStream-crossing bridges are critical components of the surface transportation system, allowing for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. However, these bridges may be subjected to extreme hydraulic loading during flood events. To ensure the longevity and functionality of bridges, it is important to evaluate and implement effective countermeasures against hydraulic failure. This study used computational fluid dynamics modeling to quantify the magnitude of hydraulic loading on typical I-girder, box beam, and slab beam bridges in Texas under extreme flow conditions and debris damming and evaluated the efficacy of existing design guidelines for countermeasures (i.e., shear keys and earwalls) meant to resist shear failure of bridges during flood events. Results indicate that the drag force induced by hydraulic loading during a range of annual exceedance probability events (2%–0.2%) can exceed the capacity of a shear key or an earwall, especially for bridges with greater flow blockage area. Flat plate debris damming on the upstream side of the bridge causes a 46% increase in the drag force compared to the no-debris condition, resulting in a force 2.3 times the shear capacity of the shear key. For the cases where the interface shear strength is not sufficient, several approaches are recommended to increase the interface shear capacity: (1) increase the size and/or quantity of the interface shear reinforcement; (2) increase the number of shear keys; and/or (3) increase the length of the bent cap hence the length of the earwall. Findings from this work can inform the development of more robust design criteria for countermeasures to reduce the risk of hydraulic-induced failures at stream-crossing bridges.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluation of Countermeasures for Hydraulic Loading on Bridges
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume29
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6494
    journal fristpage04024039-1
    journal lastpage04024039-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian