YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparing Task Performance of BIM and CAD in Completing Construction Project Activities: A Lab Experiment Approach

    Source: Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 004::page 04024029-1
    Author:
    Ken Soh
    ,
    Rahimi A. Rahman
    ,
    Ahmad Tarmizi Haron
    DOI: 10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1800
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Combined usage of computer-aided design (CAD) and building information modeling (BIM) in the same construction project can result in unwarranted issues. Stakeholders might combine CAD and BIM due to a lack of awareness of the benefits of implementing BIM exclusively. A lateral comparison between the impact of CAD and BIM on different project activities can provide stakeholders with the necessary awareness. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the task performance of BIM and CAD in completing different construction project activities in a controlled environment. To achieve that, this study used an experimental lab research approach. The study participants were industry professionals with experience in using CAD and/or BIM to produce different project outputs. The outputs were analyzed to identify shifts in task performance among the participants, including mean and median analysis and ANOVA. The results, encompassing duration, completeness, and accuracy, highlight BIM’s superiority over CAD. Extrapolating these results to overall task performance, BIM exhibits approximately two times better performance than CAD. The study reveals that BIM’s integrated and dynamic modeling approach contributes to its superior performance, enhancing accuracy, completeness, and efficiency in construction project activities. As a result, the study emphasizes the importance of using BIM exclusively. Nevertheless, this is the first study that laterally compares the performance of BIM and CAD in completing different construction project activities in a controlled environment.
    • Download: (300.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparing Task Performance of BIM and CAD in Completing Construction Project Activities: A Lab Experiment Approach

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298603
    Collections
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKen Soh
    contributor authorRahimi A. Rahman
    contributor authorAhmad Tarmizi Haron
    date accessioned2024-12-24T10:16:05Z
    date available2024-12-24T10:16:05Z
    date copyright12/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJAEIED.AEENG-1800.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298603
    description abstractCombined usage of computer-aided design (CAD) and building information modeling (BIM) in the same construction project can result in unwarranted issues. Stakeholders might combine CAD and BIM due to a lack of awareness of the benefits of implementing BIM exclusively. A lateral comparison between the impact of CAD and BIM on different project activities can provide stakeholders with the necessary awareness. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the task performance of BIM and CAD in completing different construction project activities in a controlled environment. To achieve that, this study used an experimental lab research approach. The study participants were industry professionals with experience in using CAD and/or BIM to produce different project outputs. The outputs were analyzed to identify shifts in task performance among the participants, including mean and median analysis and ANOVA. The results, encompassing duration, completeness, and accuracy, highlight BIM’s superiority over CAD. Extrapolating these results to overall task performance, BIM exhibits approximately two times better performance than CAD. The study reveals that BIM’s integrated and dynamic modeling approach contributes to its superior performance, enhancing accuracy, completeness, and efficiency in construction project activities. As a result, the study emphasizes the importance of using BIM exclusively. Nevertheless, this is the first study that laterally compares the performance of BIM and CAD in completing different construction project activities in a controlled environment.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparing Task Performance of BIM and CAD in Completing Construction Project Activities: A Lab Experiment Approach
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume30
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1800
    journal fristpage04024029-1
    journal lastpage04024029-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian