YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Posterior Precision Estimation Methods of Weighted Total Least-Squares Solution for Errors-in-Variables Model

    Source: Journal of Surveying Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004::page 04024008-1
    Author:
    Jie Han
    ,
    Songlin Zhang
    ,
    Shimeng Dong
    ,
    Qingyun Yan
    DOI: 10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1480
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper summarizes the majority of classic formulae of weighted total least-squares (WTLS) solutions for errors-in-variables (EIV) model and classified them into six categories. Next, the existing approximate posterior precision estimation methods of the WTLS solution are categorized and summarized. Based on the criterion of the orders of Taylor expansion, the current posterior precision estimation methods can be divided into first-order approximate (FOA) and second-order approximate (SOA). From the perspective of formulae, the derivation, comparison, and analysis of FOAs are placed emphasis in theory. Except for the existing FOA methods, four FOA-typed methods from the major variants of WTLS formulations are derived based on error propagation law, which enriched the posterior precision evaluation method of the WTLS solution. Two experimental examples, namely straight-line fitting and three-dimensional (3D) affine transformation, are used to evaluate the cons and pros of these posterior precision estimation methods, and their representation capability are investigated and discussed, with some suggestions being offered.
    • Download: (3.497Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Posterior Precision Estimation Methods of Weighted Total Least-Squares Solution for Errors-in-Variables Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298264
    Collections
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJie Han
    contributor authorSonglin Zhang
    contributor authorShimeng Dong
    contributor authorQingyun Yan
    date accessioned2024-12-24T10:04:58Z
    date available2024-12-24T10:04:58Z
    date copyright11/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJSUED2.SUENG-1480.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298264
    description abstractThis paper summarizes the majority of classic formulae of weighted total least-squares (WTLS) solutions for errors-in-variables (EIV) model and classified them into six categories. Next, the existing approximate posterior precision estimation methods of the WTLS solution are categorized and summarized. Based on the criterion of the orders of Taylor expansion, the current posterior precision estimation methods can be divided into first-order approximate (FOA) and second-order approximate (SOA). From the perspective of formulae, the derivation, comparison, and analysis of FOAs are placed emphasis in theory. Except for the existing FOA methods, four FOA-typed methods from the major variants of WTLS formulations are derived based on error propagation law, which enriched the posterior precision evaluation method of the WTLS solution. Two experimental examples, namely straight-line fitting and three-dimensional (3D) affine transformation, are used to evaluate the cons and pros of these posterior precision estimation methods, and their representation capability are investigated and discussed, with some suggestions being offered.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Posterior Precision Estimation Methods of Weighted Total Least-Squares Solution for Errors-in-Variables Model
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1480
    journal fristpage04024008-1
    journal lastpage04024008-14
    page14
    treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian