Timber–Encased-Steel Beams: Laboratory Experimentation and Analytical Modeling

Abstract

The flexural behavior of hybrid timber–steel encased beams comprising coniferous radiata pine (Pinus radiata) (MGP10) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) (F8) timber lamellae with bonded-in steel bars is studied. The effect of cross-section depth, steel bar size, timber species/grade, and steel bar arrangements (only bottom and top-and-bottom) on the hybrid beams’ stiffness, failure mode, ductility, and load-carrying capacity were investigated. The flexural capacity and stiffness of the doubly (top-and-bottom) reinforced beams are increased by 127% and 71%, respectively. However, in the singly (bottom) reinforced beams, the flexural capacity and stiffness are increased only by 41% and 25%, respectively, highlighting the important role of the compressive bars. The failure of all beams was associated with tensile flexural failure of timber, but the steel bars improved the ductility of the beams. The maximum coefficient of variation of the peak load in hybrid beams (CoV=14.3%) is lower than that of the bare timber beams (CoV=21.7%). Two analytical models were developed based on a linear and a bilinear stress–strain relationship for timber. The analytically predicted peak load and stiffness agree well (less than 13% and 12% difference) with the experimental results.