YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Ranking of the Commonly Used Aggregate and Asphalt Binder Systems in Arkansas

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 003::page 04024041-1
    Author:
    Tandra Bagchi
    ,
    Zahid Hossain
    ,
    Sumon Roy
    ,
    Gaylon Baumgardner
    DOI: 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1436
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) Maintenance Division is concerned about the use of certain aggregates in asphalt mixture because of their durability and performance issues. Good performance of the pavements can be ensured by selecting good-quality aggregates along with asphalt binders that can produce compatible aggregate–binder systems. The primary goal of this research was to determine proper asphalt binders and aggregates for the construction of highways in Arkansas. Three performance grade (PG) asphalt binders, namely PG 64-22, PG 70-22, and PG 76-22, prepared from two different crude sources, were investigated. This study also included four types of ARDOT-commissioned aggregates, namely gravel, sandstone, limestone, and dolomite, from four quarries throughout Arkansas. Selected properties of asphalt binders and aggregates (e.g., physical, mechanical, and chemical) were evaluated by performing a series of routine laboratory tests. To evaluate the performance of the asphalt mixtures, work of cohesion, work of adhesion, and boiling resistance tests were conducted. These aggregates, binders, and aggregate–binder systems were ranked based on the properties obtained from laboratory tests. In general, any combination of dolomite or limestone with a stiffer binder such as PG 76-22 or PG 70-22 is expected to be superior to an asphalt mixture with either sandstone or gravel. The outcomes of this research will help highway agencies and pavement professionals in selecting suitable asphalt binders and aggregates for long-lasting pavement construction.
    • Download: (2.234Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Ranking of the Commonly Used Aggregate and Asphalt Binder Systems in Arkansas

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298093
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTandra Bagchi
    contributor authorZahid Hossain
    contributor authorSumon Roy
    contributor authorGaylon Baumgardner
    date accessioned2024-12-24T09:59:39Z
    date available2024-12-24T09:59:39Z
    date copyright9/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJPEODX.PVENG-1436.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298093
    description abstractThe Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) Maintenance Division is concerned about the use of certain aggregates in asphalt mixture because of their durability and performance issues. Good performance of the pavements can be ensured by selecting good-quality aggregates along with asphalt binders that can produce compatible aggregate–binder systems. The primary goal of this research was to determine proper asphalt binders and aggregates for the construction of highways in Arkansas. Three performance grade (PG) asphalt binders, namely PG 64-22, PG 70-22, and PG 76-22, prepared from two different crude sources, were investigated. This study also included four types of ARDOT-commissioned aggregates, namely gravel, sandstone, limestone, and dolomite, from four quarries throughout Arkansas. Selected properties of asphalt binders and aggregates (e.g., physical, mechanical, and chemical) were evaluated by performing a series of routine laboratory tests. To evaluate the performance of the asphalt mixtures, work of cohesion, work of adhesion, and boiling resistance tests were conducted. These aggregates, binders, and aggregate–binder systems were ranked based on the properties obtained from laboratory tests. In general, any combination of dolomite or limestone with a stiffer binder such as PG 76-22 or PG 70-22 is expected to be superior to an asphalt mixture with either sandstone or gravel. The outcomes of this research will help highway agencies and pavement professionals in selecting suitable asphalt binders and aggregates for long-lasting pavement construction.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRanking of the Commonly Used Aggregate and Asphalt Binder Systems in Arkansas
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    identifier doi10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1436
    journal fristpage04024041-1
    journal lastpage04024041-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian