YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Composite Granular Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixture: Preparation, Performance, and Mechanism

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 003::page 04023626-1
    Author:
    Ziming Liu
    ,
    Lijun Sun
    DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16523
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Steel fiber (SF) has been widely used in asphalt mixtures to provide efficient induction heating and improve performance. However, the application of SF in asphalt mixtures still faces the issues of mixing difficulty, further performance improvement, and increased cost. To try to alleviate these issues, brucite fiber (BF) and fiber granulation technology have been adopted. First, SF and BF were mixed into the mixture according to different volume ratios. Based on the research results of engineering performance, the optimal total content and optimal volume ratio of SF and BF were determined. respectively. Then, SF and BF were prepared into a composite granular fiber (CGF). Finally, the performance of the mixture including CGF was verified, its economy was evaluated, and its mechanism was analyzed. The results show that the optimal total content of SF and BF is 0.6% and the optimal volume ratio of SF to BF is 3:2. The high-temperature rutting resistance, low-temperature cracking resistance, and moisture sensitivity of CGF are superior to that of the control sample and SF asphalt mixture, with percentages of 15.1%, 4.2%; 49.4%, 23.4%; 14.5%, 6.7% respectively. A mechanistic analysis described why CGF performed better than SF. The cost performance of the asphalt mixture with CGF surpasses that of SF, with CGF being 32.2% higher.
    • Download: (5.927Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Composite Granular Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixture: Preparation, Performance, and Mechanism

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297920
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZiming Liu
    contributor authorLijun Sun
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:57:21Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:57:21Z
    date issued2024/03/01
    identifier other10.1061-JMCEE7.MTENG-16523.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297920
    description abstractSteel fiber (SF) has been widely used in asphalt mixtures to provide efficient induction heating and improve performance. However, the application of SF in asphalt mixtures still faces the issues of mixing difficulty, further performance improvement, and increased cost. To try to alleviate these issues, brucite fiber (BF) and fiber granulation technology have been adopted. First, SF and BF were mixed into the mixture according to different volume ratios. Based on the research results of engineering performance, the optimal total content and optimal volume ratio of SF and BF were determined. respectively. Then, SF and BF were prepared into a composite granular fiber (CGF). Finally, the performance of the mixture including CGF was verified, its economy was evaluated, and its mechanism was analyzed. The results show that the optimal total content of SF and BF is 0.6% and the optimal volume ratio of SF to BF is 3:2. The high-temperature rutting resistance, low-temperature cracking resistance, and moisture sensitivity of CGF are superior to that of the control sample and SF asphalt mixture, with percentages of 15.1%, 4.2%; 49.4%, 23.4%; 14.5%, 6.7% respectively. A mechanistic analysis described why CGF performed better than SF. The cost performance of the asphalt mixture with CGF surpasses that of SF, with CGF being 32.2% higher.
    publisherASCE
    titleComposite Granular Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixture: Preparation, Performance, and Mechanism
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume36
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16523
    journal fristpage04023626-1
    journal lastpage04023626-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian