Show simple item record

contributor authorShengmin Luo
contributor authorBaochun Zhou
contributor authorWilliam J. Likos
contributor authorNing Lu
date accessioned2024-04-27T22:49:10Z
date available2024-04-27T22:49:10Z
date issued2024/02/01
identifier other10.1061-JGGEFK.GTENG-11647.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297579
description abstractPore-size distribution (PSD) of soil is a fundamental property that determines flows of water, heat, chemicals, and electricity and controls distributions of stress and deformation. PSD can be intrinsically related to the soil–water retention curve (SWRC), which is a constitutive relationship describing how the soil skeleton retains pore water via adsorption and capillarity. A general framework to quantify soil’s PSD is proposed by first fitting an analytical SWRC model to experimental water retention curves that explicitly separate the SWRC into an adsorptive SWRC and a capillary SWRC. The PSD is then estimated at incremental steps by combining the capillary SWRC and the conventional Young–Laplace equation relating capillary pressure to pore size. Cumulative and density PSD curves for 11 soils covering a wide spectrum of soil types are determined and compared with the PSD functions independently measured using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Good agreement is observed in the estimated pore size range, distribution pattern, and peak position determined from the two different methods. Differences observed in the methods are attributed to differences inherent in the use of wetting and nonwetting fluids to probe the pore space. The SWRC-based method generally characterizes pore sizes ranging from 100 to 0.02 μm with a major peak located within a pore diameter range of 1–10 μm. As the clay content increases, a secondary peak becomes evident at smaller pore sizes (about 0.01–0.1 μm), where the bimodal pattern reflects the dual-porosity microstructure commonly observed for clayey soils. For soils containing swelling clays, PSD can change substantially with variation in water content; thus, the water-based method is more appropriate than MIP for applications to geotechnical engineering practice.
publisherASCE
titleDetermining Capillary Pore–Size Distribution of Soil from Soil–Water Retention Curve
typeJournal Article
journal volume150
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11647
journal fristpage04023138-1
journal lastpage04023138-14
page14
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record