YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Ontological Analysis for Comparison of the Concepts of Sustainable Building and Intelligent Building

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004::page 04024014-1
    Author:
    Alireza Borhani
    ,
    Atieh Borhani
    ,
    Carrie Sturts Dossick
    ,
    Julie Jupp
    DOI: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13711
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The concept of intelligent building is emerging in the contemporary built environment. Intelligent buildings aim to leverage digital technologies and information throughout the building’s life cycle (design, construction, and operation phases) to improve the building’s performance and value. In recent years, academic scholars and industry practitioners have made efforts to articulate the intelligent building concept and identify its components. However, there is still no commonly accepted definition for the term intelligent (or smart) building. Furthermore, the term is used interchangeably with similar terms such as sustainable building and high-performance building. The primary gaps in research are the lack of a holistic and clearly defined list of intelligent building components. This gap limits building stakeholders’ abilities to decide which technologies to implement in their buildings, prove its capabilities and advantages, and improve its performance. In response to the identified gaps, this research conceptualizes intelligent building in comparison with the concept of sustainable building. We identified the key components that each concept entails and conducted a comparative analysis of the identified components. The findings of this research include a categorization of intelligent building’s definitions which helps to conceptualize intelligent building and distinguish it from other similar concepts. In addition, the research team used the developed ontologies for intelligent and sustainable buildings to provide a fundamental overview of the structure of building evaluation systems and their different approaches for determining evaluation criteria. Overall, this study contributes to the body of knowledge by identifying and classifying components of intelligent buildings, which is a prerequisite for intelligent buildings’ evaluation. It also makes a distinction between the concepts of intelligent building and sustainable building in order to determine their context and applications.
    • Download: (2.536Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Ontological Analysis for Comparison of the Concepts of Sustainable Building and Intelligent Building

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297407
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAlireza Borhani
    contributor authorAtieh Borhani
    contributor authorCarrie Sturts Dossick
    contributor authorJulie Jupp
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:45:06Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:45:06Z
    date issued2024/04/01
    identifier other10.1061-JCEMD4.COENG-13711.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297407
    description abstractThe concept of intelligent building is emerging in the contemporary built environment. Intelligent buildings aim to leverage digital technologies and information throughout the building’s life cycle (design, construction, and operation phases) to improve the building’s performance and value. In recent years, academic scholars and industry practitioners have made efforts to articulate the intelligent building concept and identify its components. However, there is still no commonly accepted definition for the term intelligent (or smart) building. Furthermore, the term is used interchangeably with similar terms such as sustainable building and high-performance building. The primary gaps in research are the lack of a holistic and clearly defined list of intelligent building components. This gap limits building stakeholders’ abilities to decide which technologies to implement in their buildings, prove its capabilities and advantages, and improve its performance. In response to the identified gaps, this research conceptualizes intelligent building in comparison with the concept of sustainable building. We identified the key components that each concept entails and conducted a comparative analysis of the identified components. The findings of this research include a categorization of intelligent building’s definitions which helps to conceptualize intelligent building and distinguish it from other similar concepts. In addition, the research team used the developed ontologies for intelligent and sustainable buildings to provide a fundamental overview of the structure of building evaluation systems and their different approaches for determining evaluation criteria. Overall, this study contributes to the body of knowledge by identifying and classifying components of intelligent buildings, which is a prerequisite for intelligent buildings’ evaluation. It also makes a distinction between the concepts of intelligent building and sustainable building in order to determine their context and applications.
    publisherASCE
    titleAn Ontological Analysis for Comparison of the Concepts of Sustainable Building and Intelligent Building
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13711
    journal fristpage04024014-1
    journal lastpage04024014-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian