YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multicriterion Decision-Support Model for Selecting the Appropriate Delivery Method in Sustainable Construction Projects

    Source: Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 002::page 04024004-1
    Author:
    Salma Ahmed
    ,
    Sameh M. El-Sayegh
    DOI: 10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1669
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Selecting the appropriate delivery method is of paramount importance, especially in sustainable construction projects that have unique characteristics that are different from their traditional counterparts. A new decision-support model is proposed to assist decision-makers in this selection process. Thirty-six key selection criteria were first identified, through literature review, and then divided into traditional and sustainability-specific categories. The relative weights of these selection criteria were then assessed using an analytic hierarchy process through a survey administered to construction professionals. The results indicated that the three most important groups of selection criteria were level of integration, technology, and innovation, in addition to scope-related criteria. Another questionnaire survey was administered to evaluate the effectiveness of the three common delivery methods––design–bid–build (DBB), design–build (DB) and construction management at risk (CMR)––in achieving the 36 identified selection criteria. The results revealed that the traditional DBB delivery method was outmatched by the heightened needs of sustainable construction projects for collaboration and integration that can only be achieved through alternative delivery methods, such as DB and CMR. The proposed model consists of four functions––strategic alignment, screening of the comprehensive selection criteria, evaluation of the three project delivery methods, and final selection. The proposed model provides a comprehensive list of selection criteria for helping decision-makers produce a defensible rationale for choosing the appropriate delivery method for their sustainable construction project. A case study is also presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed decision-support model. Sustainable construction is significant in mitigating environmental impacts and promoting better health and quality of life. But it has unique characteristics that are different from conventional construction. To address these characteristics, there is a need for updating project management practices to satisfy the demands of sustainable construction projects. Among the significant project management decisions is the selection of the appropriate project delivery method (PDM) for sustainable construction projects. The practical relevance of this study is the development of a comprehensive multicriterion decision-support model that incorporates both sustainability-specific and traditional selection criteria to help owners choose the most appropriate delivery method for their sustainable construction projects. The model offers owners an invaluable tool for producing a defensible rationale to justify choosing a specific PDM. The easy-to-follow model allows owners to readily use the model without needing expertise in performing arduous mathematical tasks. Once the required selection criteria are fed into the model, it automatically and instantaneously sorts and ranks the alternative delivery method options. The owner then selects the most appropriate PDM that strategically aligns with the sustainable project’s goals. This model provides owners with a time- and resource-efficient technique for selecting the most appropriate delivery method. Selecting the appropriate PDM for sustainable construction projects enhances the chances of their successful completion and the achievement of the desired goals. This, in turn, encourages the execution of more sustainable construction projects, with their clear and established benefits to society, the economy, and the environment.
    • Download: (497.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Multicriterion Decision-Support Model for Selecting the Appropriate Delivery Method in Sustainable Construction Projects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297250
    Collections
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSalma Ahmed
    contributor authorSameh M. El-Sayegh
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:41:04Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:41:04Z
    date issued2024/06/01
    identifier other10.1061-JAEIED.AEENG-1669.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297250
    description abstractSelecting the appropriate delivery method is of paramount importance, especially in sustainable construction projects that have unique characteristics that are different from their traditional counterparts. A new decision-support model is proposed to assist decision-makers in this selection process. Thirty-six key selection criteria were first identified, through literature review, and then divided into traditional and sustainability-specific categories. The relative weights of these selection criteria were then assessed using an analytic hierarchy process through a survey administered to construction professionals. The results indicated that the three most important groups of selection criteria were level of integration, technology, and innovation, in addition to scope-related criteria. Another questionnaire survey was administered to evaluate the effectiveness of the three common delivery methods––design–bid–build (DBB), design–build (DB) and construction management at risk (CMR)––in achieving the 36 identified selection criteria. The results revealed that the traditional DBB delivery method was outmatched by the heightened needs of sustainable construction projects for collaboration and integration that can only be achieved through alternative delivery methods, such as DB and CMR. The proposed model consists of four functions––strategic alignment, screening of the comprehensive selection criteria, evaluation of the three project delivery methods, and final selection. The proposed model provides a comprehensive list of selection criteria for helping decision-makers produce a defensible rationale for choosing the appropriate delivery method for their sustainable construction project. A case study is also presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed decision-support model. Sustainable construction is significant in mitigating environmental impacts and promoting better health and quality of life. But it has unique characteristics that are different from conventional construction. To address these characteristics, there is a need for updating project management practices to satisfy the demands of sustainable construction projects. Among the significant project management decisions is the selection of the appropriate project delivery method (PDM) for sustainable construction projects. The practical relevance of this study is the development of a comprehensive multicriterion decision-support model that incorporates both sustainability-specific and traditional selection criteria to help owners choose the most appropriate delivery method for their sustainable construction projects. The model offers owners an invaluable tool for producing a defensible rationale to justify choosing a specific PDM. The easy-to-follow model allows owners to readily use the model without needing expertise in performing arduous mathematical tasks. Once the required selection criteria are fed into the model, it automatically and instantaneously sorts and ranks the alternative delivery method options. The owner then selects the most appropriate PDM that strategically aligns with the sustainable project’s goals. This model provides owners with a time- and resource-efficient technique for selecting the most appropriate delivery method. Selecting the appropriate PDM for sustainable construction projects enhances the chances of their successful completion and the achievement of the desired goals. This, in turn, encourages the execution of more sustainable construction projects, with their clear and established benefits to society, the economy, and the environment.
    publisherASCE
    titleMulticriterion Decision-Support Model for Selecting the Appropriate Delivery Method in Sustainable Construction Projects
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume30
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1669
    journal fristpage04024004-1
    journal lastpage04024004-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian