YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Replacing Cement with GGBS and Fly Ash on the Flexural and Shear Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams

    Source: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2024:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 002::page 04024011-1
    Author:
    R. A. Hawileh
    ,
    J. A. Abdalla
    ,
    W. Nawaz
    ,
    A. Sharif Zadeh
    ,
    A. Mirghani
    ,
    A. Al Nassara
    ,
    A. Khartabil
    ,
    M. Shantia
    DOI: 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1339
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Cement has historically been a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, and substituting cement in concrete with alternative cementitious materials will lead to a decrease in carbon footprints. A vast amount of literature focuses on the mechanical properties and performance of concrete partially replaced with different cementitious materials. However, the literature on the structural performance of concrete with different cementitious materials is very limited. Therefore, the main aim of the current experimental study is to evaluate the flexural and shear performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams cast with various replacement percentages of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and fly ash. A total of 33 RC beams were cast with 50% and 70% replacement of cement with GGBS and fly ash. In addition, the tensile and compressive strengths of the different mixes with GGBS and fly ash were also compared with the 100% OPC mix at 28 and 56 days. All beams were subjected to monotonic four-point bending tests and load-deflection response curves along with failure modes were presented. The experimental results showed that the average compressive and tensile strength of mixes with GGBS and fly ash replacement were comparable with OPC. The mixes with 50% replacement and higher usage of GGBS showed higher compressive strengths compared to mixes with 70% replacement. In addition, the flexural performance of beams with GGBS and fly ash were comparable to the specimen with 100% OPC. Even GGBS and fly ash replacement increased the stiffness and yield strength of the beam specimens by 36 and 16% compared to the control specimen. The specimens tested at 56 days with higher usage of fly ash and 50% replacement showed the highest flexural load as compared with other specimens. In the case of the shear specimens, the normalized ultimate shear capacity of RC beams is not significantly affected when OPC is replaced with 50% and 70% of GGBS and fly ash, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the overall behavior of SCM beams was comparable to that of the control OPC beams. The ACI 318-19 design guidelines were also used to predict the flexural and shear capacity of RC beams cast with GGBS and fly ash. The aforementioned experiments indicate the viability and effectiveness of cement replacements in concrete with SCM, which in return, contribute to lower carbon footprints.
    • Download: (1.964Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of Replacing Cement with GGBS and Fly Ash on the Flexural and Shear Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297044
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorR. A. Hawileh
    contributor authorJ. A. Abdalla
    contributor authorW. Nawaz
    contributor authorA. Sharif Zadeh
    contributor authorA. Mirghani
    contributor authorA. Al Nassara
    contributor authorA. Khartabil
    contributor authorM. Shantia
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:36:07Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:36:07Z
    date issued2024/05/01
    identifier other10.1061-PPSCFX.SCENG-1339.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297044
    description abstractCement has historically been a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, and substituting cement in concrete with alternative cementitious materials will lead to a decrease in carbon footprints. A vast amount of literature focuses on the mechanical properties and performance of concrete partially replaced with different cementitious materials. However, the literature on the structural performance of concrete with different cementitious materials is very limited. Therefore, the main aim of the current experimental study is to evaluate the flexural and shear performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams cast with various replacement percentages of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and fly ash. A total of 33 RC beams were cast with 50% and 70% replacement of cement with GGBS and fly ash. In addition, the tensile and compressive strengths of the different mixes with GGBS and fly ash were also compared with the 100% OPC mix at 28 and 56 days. All beams were subjected to monotonic four-point bending tests and load-deflection response curves along with failure modes were presented. The experimental results showed that the average compressive and tensile strength of mixes with GGBS and fly ash replacement were comparable with OPC. The mixes with 50% replacement and higher usage of GGBS showed higher compressive strengths compared to mixes with 70% replacement. In addition, the flexural performance of beams with GGBS and fly ash were comparable to the specimen with 100% OPC. Even GGBS and fly ash replacement increased the stiffness and yield strength of the beam specimens by 36 and 16% compared to the control specimen. The specimens tested at 56 days with higher usage of fly ash and 50% replacement showed the highest flexural load as compared with other specimens. In the case of the shear specimens, the normalized ultimate shear capacity of RC beams is not significantly affected when OPC is replaced with 50% and 70% of GGBS and fly ash, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the overall behavior of SCM beams was comparable to that of the control OPC beams. The ACI 318-19 design guidelines were also used to predict the flexural and shear capacity of RC beams cast with GGBS and fly ash. The aforementioned experiments indicate the viability and effectiveness of cement replacements in concrete with SCM, which in return, contribute to lower carbon footprints.
    publisherASCE
    titleEffects of Replacing Cement with GGBS and Fly Ash on the Flexural and Shear Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume29
    journal issue2
    journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1339
    journal fristpage04024011-1
    journal lastpage04024011-13
    page13
    treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2024:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian