YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Shared Autonomous Vehicle Modeling Considering System Optimization and Simulation

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004::page 04024011-1
    Author:
    Kai Huang
    ,
    Yantao Huang
    ,
    Kara M. Kockelman
    DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7738
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This paper optimizes the assignment of shared automated vehicles under users’ uncertain departure times. Automated vehicles can drive themselves, so no staff are needed to relocate vehicles in the one-way carsharing system. To optimize fleet placement and use, a two-phase solution method was established. Phase 1 strategically distributes vehicles across stations using a system optimization approach, while Phase 2 tracks vehicle movements via an agent-based simulation model. Phase 1 solutions serve as inputs to Phase 2 simulations. Using a fleet size of roughly 10,000 vehicles, case study applications were run across the Austin, Texas region's six-county network. In the base case setting, results suggest that system profits are optimized when vehicle rental is priced at $1.28/km ($0.8/mi). The number of proactive vehicle relocations falls 9.8% if the relocation operation cost rises from $0.096/km ($0.06/mi) to $0.32/km ($0.2/mi). Average per-trip profit is $10.60 when using high-cost vehicles, and $11.60 when using low-cost vehicles. Results from a 3-h simulation show an average person-trip length of 25 km (15.6 mi), with 29.6 min of average driving time. When a 24-h day was simulated, the vehicle-occupied time and vehicle-distance traveled were 4 h and 200 km (125 mi) per vehicle-day, respectively. The low coefficient of variation of satisfied demand across 30 demand scenarios suggests the robustness of the two-phase solution method.
    • Download: (3.156Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Shared Autonomous Vehicle Modeling Considering System Optimization and Simulation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296882
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKai Huang
    contributor authorYantao Huang
    contributor authorKara M. Kockelman
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:32:11Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:32:11Z
    date issued2024/04/01
    identifier other10.1061-JTEPBS.TEENG-7738.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296882
    description abstractThis paper optimizes the assignment of shared automated vehicles under users’ uncertain departure times. Automated vehicles can drive themselves, so no staff are needed to relocate vehicles in the one-way carsharing system. To optimize fleet placement and use, a two-phase solution method was established. Phase 1 strategically distributes vehicles across stations using a system optimization approach, while Phase 2 tracks vehicle movements via an agent-based simulation model. Phase 1 solutions serve as inputs to Phase 2 simulations. Using a fleet size of roughly 10,000 vehicles, case study applications were run across the Austin, Texas region's six-county network. In the base case setting, results suggest that system profits are optimized when vehicle rental is priced at $1.28/km ($0.8/mi). The number of proactive vehicle relocations falls 9.8% if the relocation operation cost rises from $0.096/km ($0.06/mi) to $0.32/km ($0.2/mi). Average per-trip profit is $10.60 when using high-cost vehicles, and $11.60 when using low-cost vehicles. Results from a 3-h simulation show an average person-trip length of 25 km (15.6 mi), with 29.6 min of average driving time. When a 24-h day was simulated, the vehicle-occupied time and vehicle-distance traveled were 4 h and 200 km (125 mi) per vehicle-day, respectively. The low coefficient of variation of satisfied demand across 30 demand scenarios suggests the robustness of the two-phase solution method.
    publisherASCE
    titleShared Autonomous Vehicle Modeling Considering System Optimization and Simulation
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7738
    journal fristpage04024011-1
    journal lastpage04024011-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian