YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Analysis of the Practical Impact of Mixing Pavement Thickness Design Methods: Study on Rigid Aircraft Pavement Concrete Strength in Australia

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 002::page 04024007-1
    Author:
    Greg White
    ,
    Sean Jamieson
    DOI: 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1446
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Rigid airport pavements are a critical part of the Australian airport pavement inventory. The thickness design of rigid airport pavements in Australia was previously based on Australian developed charts and a conservative characteristic concrete strength, but in recent years this has changed to reliance on the software FAARFIELD provided by the US. Australian designers have used FAARFIELD in combination with the historical and conservative definition of concrete strength. That conflicts with the intended use of a less conservative Australian concrete strength value for inputting into FAARFIELD. The unintended consequence of this change in Australian practice is an additional 44 to 74 mm of concrete slab thickness, depending on the aircraft type, subgrade support, and concrete strength used. This additional thickness costs an additional AUD 185,000 to AUD 429,000 and 154,000 to 333,000  kg.eCO2 for a modest 100×100-m rigid airport pavement development. This additional financial and environmental burden is not justified, and Australian airport pavement designers should adjust their thickness design calculations to avoid this unintended overdesign in the future. This example also serves as a lesson regarding the potential consequence of mixing elements from different systems for pavement thickness design.
    • Download: (1.482Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Analysis of the Practical Impact of Mixing Pavement Thickness Design Methods: Study on Rigid Aircraft Pavement Concrete Strength in Australia

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296682
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGreg White
    contributor authorSean Jamieson
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:27:05Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:27:05Z
    date issued2024/06/01
    identifier other10.1061-JPEODX.PVENG-1446.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296682
    description abstractRigid airport pavements are a critical part of the Australian airport pavement inventory. The thickness design of rigid airport pavements in Australia was previously based on Australian developed charts and a conservative characteristic concrete strength, but in recent years this has changed to reliance on the software FAARFIELD provided by the US. Australian designers have used FAARFIELD in combination with the historical and conservative definition of concrete strength. That conflicts with the intended use of a less conservative Australian concrete strength value for inputting into FAARFIELD. The unintended consequence of this change in Australian practice is an additional 44 to 74 mm of concrete slab thickness, depending on the aircraft type, subgrade support, and concrete strength used. This additional thickness costs an additional AUD 185,000 to AUD 429,000 and 154,000 to 333,000  kg.eCO2 for a modest 100×100-m rigid airport pavement development. This additional financial and environmental burden is not justified, and Australian airport pavement designers should adjust their thickness design calculations to avoid this unintended overdesign in the future. This example also serves as a lesson regarding the potential consequence of mixing elements from different systems for pavement thickness design.
    publisherASCE
    titleAnalysis of the Practical Impact of Mixing Pavement Thickness Design Methods: Study on Rigid Aircraft Pavement Concrete Strength in Australia
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    identifier doi10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1446
    journal fristpage04024007-1
    journal lastpage04024007-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian