YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Unit Operation and Process Modeling with Physics-Informed Machine Learning

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004::page 04024002-1
    Author:
    Haochen Li
    ,
    David Spelman
    ,
    John Sansalone
    DOI: 10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7467
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Machine learning (ML) is increasingly implemented to model water infrastructure dynamics. Common ML models are primarily data-driven and require a significant amount of data for robust training. Often, obtaining robust data at higher temporal and spatial resolutions in water systems can be challenging due to cost and time considerations. In such scenarios, integrating the existing scientific knowledge into an ML model as physics-informed ML can be advantageous to enhance predictive capability and generalizability. This study examines the predictive capability and generalizability of physics-informed ML and common ML models for typical unit operation and process (UOP) system dynamics in urban water treatment. The systems studied are (1) a continuous stirred-tank reactor, (2) activated sludge reactor, and a (3) fixed-bed granular adsorption reactor. Applications of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are presented. Results demonstrate when the availability of data is limited: (1) common ML models are not necessarily robust for predicting water system dynamics, except when system dynamics exhibit simpler periodic patterns. Common ML models also do not generalize across different loading conditions. (2) In contrast, the developed PINN models yield high predictive capability and generalizability. (3) Benefiting from the embedded prior knowledge, PINNs require significantly reduced data sets for robust predictions. These results suggest hybridizing physics principles and domain knowledge into the ML framework can be critical for robust UOP and water systems modeling.
    • Download: (3.347Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Unit Operation and Process Modeling with Physics-Informed Machine Learning

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296608
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHaochen Li
    contributor authorDavid Spelman
    contributor authorJohn Sansalone
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:25:03Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:25:03Z
    date issued2024/04/01
    identifier other10.1061-JOEEDU.EEENG-7467.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296608
    description abstractMachine learning (ML) is increasingly implemented to model water infrastructure dynamics. Common ML models are primarily data-driven and require a significant amount of data for robust training. Often, obtaining robust data at higher temporal and spatial resolutions in water systems can be challenging due to cost and time considerations. In such scenarios, integrating the existing scientific knowledge into an ML model as physics-informed ML can be advantageous to enhance predictive capability and generalizability. This study examines the predictive capability and generalizability of physics-informed ML and common ML models for typical unit operation and process (UOP) system dynamics in urban water treatment. The systems studied are (1) a continuous stirred-tank reactor, (2) activated sludge reactor, and a (3) fixed-bed granular adsorption reactor. Applications of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are presented. Results demonstrate when the availability of data is limited: (1) common ML models are not necessarily robust for predicting water system dynamics, except when system dynamics exhibit simpler periodic patterns. Common ML models also do not generalize across different loading conditions. (2) In contrast, the developed PINN models yield high predictive capability and generalizability. (3) Benefiting from the embedded prior knowledge, PINNs require significantly reduced data sets for robust predictions. These results suggest hybridizing physics principles and domain knowledge into the ML framework can be critical for robust UOP and water systems modeling.
    publisherASCE
    titleUnit Operation and Process Modeling with Physics-Informed Machine Learning
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7467
    journal fristpage04024002-1
    journal lastpage04024002-17
    page17
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian