YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Exploring Critical Risk Factors in Volumetric Modular Construction: Fault Tree Analysis with Stakeholders' Perspectives on Probability and Impact

    Source: Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 004::page 04023037-1
    Author:
    Ayaz Ahmad Khan
    ,
    Rongrong Yu
    ,
    Ning Gu
    ,
    Tingting Liu
    ,
    James Walsh
    ,
    Samad Sepasgozar
    ,
    Damien Crough
    DOI: 10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1608
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Numerous benefits are delivered by the utilization of volumetric modular construction (VMC); however, it carries unique risks at different project stages, which is one of the significant reasons for its low adoption. To date, scant research has adequately examined VMC’s risks during projects. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by identifying and assessing critical risk factors (CRFs) within VMC from different stakeholder group perspectives in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). A survey of 110 VMC professionals from Australia and NZ, which examined 31 specific CRFs, was established via a literature review. The CRFs were divided into their associated VMC project stage: (1) design and planning (DP); (2) off-site manufacturing (OM); (3) transport and logistics (TL); and (4) on-site assembly (OA). Fault tree analysis (FTA) was then used to analyze the CRFs. The results indicate that the DP stage risks are the most significant since they could affect VMC's downstream stages. Essential CRFs at each stage were design freeze or change order issues, module geometry conflicts, size and weight restrictions, and dimensional and geometrical variabilities. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study represents a first attempt at analyzing VMC CRFs in the Australian and NZ construction industry. Overall, this study could contribute to enhancing VMC practices and furthering VMC's adoption as a sustainable and circular construction practice.
    • Download: (1.397Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Exploring Critical Risk Factors in Volumetric Modular Construction: Fault Tree Analysis with Stakeholders' Perspectives on Probability and Impact

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296383
    Collections
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAyaz Ahmad Khan
    contributor authorRongrong Yu
    contributor authorNing Gu
    contributor authorTingting Liu
    contributor authorJames Walsh
    contributor authorSamad Sepasgozar
    contributor authorDamien Crough
    date accessioned2024-04-27T20:59:02Z
    date available2024-04-27T20:59:02Z
    date issued2023/12/01
    identifier other10.1061-JAEIED.AEENG-1608.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296383
    description abstractNumerous benefits are delivered by the utilization of volumetric modular construction (VMC); however, it carries unique risks at different project stages, which is one of the significant reasons for its low adoption. To date, scant research has adequately examined VMC’s risks during projects. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by identifying and assessing critical risk factors (CRFs) within VMC from different stakeholder group perspectives in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). A survey of 110 VMC professionals from Australia and NZ, which examined 31 specific CRFs, was established via a literature review. The CRFs were divided into their associated VMC project stage: (1) design and planning (DP); (2) off-site manufacturing (OM); (3) transport and logistics (TL); and (4) on-site assembly (OA). Fault tree analysis (FTA) was then used to analyze the CRFs. The results indicate that the DP stage risks are the most significant since they could affect VMC's downstream stages. Essential CRFs at each stage were design freeze or change order issues, module geometry conflicts, size and weight restrictions, and dimensional and geometrical variabilities. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study represents a first attempt at analyzing VMC CRFs in the Australian and NZ construction industry. Overall, this study could contribute to enhancing VMC practices and furthering VMC's adoption as a sustainable and circular construction practice.
    publisherASCE
    titleExploring Critical Risk Factors in Volumetric Modular Construction: Fault Tree Analysis with Stakeholders' Perspectives on Probability and Impact
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume29
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1608
    journal fristpage04023037-1
    journal lastpage04023037-18
    page18
    treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian