YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Effectiveness of Data Augmentation Using Traditional Approaches versus StyleGANs in Automated Sewer Defect Detection

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 009::page 04023045-1
    Author:
    Qianqian Zhou
    ,
    Zuxiang Situ
    ,
    Shuai Teng
    ,
    Gongfa Chen
    DOI: 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5831
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This study compared how traditional data augmentation and the state-of-the-art style-based generative adversarial network (StyleGAN) benefit automated sewer defect detection using a You Only Look Once (YOLO) object detection model. There were 25 augmentation scenarios (13 individual augmentations, 8 combined augmentations, and 3 StyleGAN augmentations, as well as a baseline) investigated, with 3 types of data set sizes (300, 600, and 1,200 images) and 4 types of sewer defects (disjoint, obstacle, residential wall, and tree root). Results showed that geometric transformations generally outperformed color transformations. Among the traditional methods, random cropping worked best to improve the detector performance, meaning that combined effects may not be as strong as a single type of augmentation. It was also noted that not all augmentation measures benefited the detection, as in our case, 24% of the augmentation effects resulted in lower detection accuracy than the baseline scenario. StyleGAN performed remarkably well in improving the data quality through increasing style and diversity. Moreover, data augmentation had a greater impact on improving the detection of residential wall and tree root [with an increase in the mean of average precision (AP) of 32% and 22%] in comparison to disjoint and obstacle (21% and 16%), respectively. The findings will benefit the future selection and use of augmentation methods in enhancing the performance of deep learning models.
    • Download: (2.783Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Effectiveness of Data Augmentation Using Traditional Approaches versus StyleGANs in Automated Sewer Defect Detection

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296284
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQianqian Zhou
    contributor authorZuxiang Situ
    contributor authorShuai Teng
    contributor authorGongfa Chen
    date accessioned2024-04-27T20:56:18Z
    date available2024-04-27T20:56:18Z
    date issued2023/09/01
    identifier other10.1061-JWRMD5.WRENG-5831.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296284
    description abstractThis study compared how traditional data augmentation and the state-of-the-art style-based generative adversarial network (StyleGAN) benefit automated sewer defect detection using a You Only Look Once (YOLO) object detection model. There were 25 augmentation scenarios (13 individual augmentations, 8 combined augmentations, and 3 StyleGAN augmentations, as well as a baseline) investigated, with 3 types of data set sizes (300, 600, and 1,200 images) and 4 types of sewer defects (disjoint, obstacle, residential wall, and tree root). Results showed that geometric transformations generally outperformed color transformations. Among the traditional methods, random cropping worked best to improve the detector performance, meaning that combined effects may not be as strong as a single type of augmentation. It was also noted that not all augmentation measures benefited the detection, as in our case, 24% of the augmentation effects resulted in lower detection accuracy than the baseline scenario. StyleGAN performed remarkably well in improving the data quality through increasing style and diversity. Moreover, data augmentation had a greater impact on improving the detection of residential wall and tree root [with an increase in the mean of average precision (AP) of 32% and 22%] in comparison to disjoint and obstacle (21% and 16%), respectively. The findings will benefit the future selection and use of augmentation methods in enhancing the performance of deep learning models.
    publisherASCE
    titleComparative Effectiveness of Data Augmentation Using Traditional Approaches versus StyleGANs in Automated Sewer Defect Detection
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume149
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5831
    journal fristpage04023045-1
    journal lastpage04023045-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian