YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Carbon-Neutral Goal in China for the Electric Vehicle Industry with Solid-State Battery’s Contribution in 2035 to 2045

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 012::page 04023082-1
    Author:
    Aqib Zahoor
    ,
    Yajuan Yu
    ,
    Saima Batool
    ,
    Muhammad Idrees
    ,
    Guozhu Mao
    DOI: 10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7340
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: New energy vehicles and solid-state batteries (SSBs) will help to reduce the carbon footprint by up to 103% if fully commercialized and installed by 2035. This research collected market data on China’s E-car power batteries in the production phase from the past five years to the next 25 years in order to calculate the carbon emission reduction ratio achieved by new electric vehicles’ (EVs) power batteries. Using SimaPro software, analysis results reveal that among seven types of batteries, lithium iron phosphate (LFP), cobalt manganese oxide (NCM-811) batteries, and SSBs have the lowest production carbon footprint values of 44, 51.1, and 43.7 kgCO2e, respectively. When compared to LFP and NCM batteries, SSBs have the potential to reduce the carbon footprint of EV batteries by up to 39%. So, SSBs will have a higher market value and installed capacity, accounting for 65% of all batteries by 2040, which can prove the significance of new energy vehicles in reducing carbon emissions in the transportation field. Finally, the five technical and economic characteristics (cost competitiveness, cycle life, C-rate, energy density, and safety) of LFP-based lithium-ion battery (LIB), NMC-811, and lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO) based on SSBs batteries are summarized. The promise of the SSBs’ energy density and safety has prompted several automakers to invest in NCM-811 and LFP technologies. The cost of SSBs per kWh will eventually be lower than that of its counterparts once supply chains are established. This is because the material cost is reduced when using solid-state electrolytes with higher energy density. After all, less raw material is required per kWh.
    • Download: (1.192Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Carbon-Neutral Goal in China for the Electric Vehicle Industry with Solid-State Battery’s Contribution in 2035 to 2045

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296175
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAqib Zahoor
    contributor authorYajuan Yu
    contributor authorSaima Batool
    contributor authorMuhammad Idrees
    contributor authorGuozhu Mao
    date accessioned2024-04-27T20:53:17Z
    date available2024-04-27T20:53:17Z
    date issued2023/12/01
    identifier other10.1061-JOEEDU.EEENG-7340.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296175
    description abstractNew energy vehicles and solid-state batteries (SSBs) will help to reduce the carbon footprint by up to 103% if fully commercialized and installed by 2035. This research collected market data on China’s E-car power batteries in the production phase from the past five years to the next 25 years in order to calculate the carbon emission reduction ratio achieved by new electric vehicles’ (EVs) power batteries. Using SimaPro software, analysis results reveal that among seven types of batteries, lithium iron phosphate (LFP), cobalt manganese oxide (NCM-811) batteries, and SSBs have the lowest production carbon footprint values of 44, 51.1, and 43.7 kgCO2e, respectively. When compared to LFP and NCM batteries, SSBs have the potential to reduce the carbon footprint of EV batteries by up to 39%. So, SSBs will have a higher market value and installed capacity, accounting for 65% of all batteries by 2040, which can prove the significance of new energy vehicles in reducing carbon emissions in the transportation field. Finally, the five technical and economic characteristics (cost competitiveness, cycle life, C-rate, energy density, and safety) of LFP-based lithium-ion battery (LIB), NMC-811, and lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO) based on SSBs batteries are summarized. The promise of the SSBs’ energy density and safety has prompted several automakers to invest in NCM-811 and LFP technologies. The cost of SSBs per kWh will eventually be lower than that of its counterparts once supply chains are established. This is because the material cost is reduced when using solid-state electrolytes with higher energy density. After all, less raw material is required per kWh.
    publisherASCE
    titleThe Carbon-Neutral Goal in China for the Electric Vehicle Industry with Solid-State Battery’s Contribution in 2035 to 2045
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume149
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7340
    journal fristpage04023082-1
    journal lastpage04023082-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian