YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessment of 40 Empirical Models for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration under the Three Major Climate Zones of Iraq

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 011::page 04023025-1
    Author:
    Alaa Adel Jasim Al-Hasani
    ,
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    DOI: 10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10187
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Accurate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) estimation is crucial for water irrigation management and sustainable agriculture planning. The difficulty in obtaining several data requirements for employing the recommended Food and Agriculture Organization Penman-Monteith method (FAO-PM) for reliable estimation of ETo has led to the development of many empirical models. This is particularly crucial for Iraq, located in West Asia (29°15′00″–38°15′00″ N; 38°45′00″–48°45′00″ E), where meteorological data are often limited or missing. The objectives of the present study were to assess the performance of 40 ETo empirical models (13 radiation-based, 13 mass-transfer-based, and 14 temperature-based) against the FAO-PM model and identify alternative models with the minimal available data in three major climatic zones of Iraq: the Mediterranean climate (MCZ), semiarid (SCZ), and arid desert (ACZ). The recent ERA5 data set was adopted. The results indicate that (1) the Rohwer mass-transfer method is the best for estimating ETo for two-thirds of Iraq with a mean correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.97, mean Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) of 0.84, mean percent bias (PBIAS) of −8.92%, mean Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) of 0.92, and root mean square error (RMSE)-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) of 0.27, followed by the Penman (R2=0.90, KGE=0.75, NSE=0.77, RSR=0.46, and PBIAS=6.36%) and Caprio (R2=0.90, KGE=0.66, NSE=0.54, RSR=0.58, and PBIAS=24.64%) models; (2) Caprio is the best radiation-based model for estimating ETo, mainly in the ACZ, whereas Kharrufa is the best temperature-based model for estimating ETo, primarily in the SCZ and ACZ. Overall, the mass-transfer-based models performed better than other-based models for ETo estimation. The outcomes of this study provide a scientific reference for accurate ETo estimation using empirical models under limited data sets, which is valuable for irrigation management in Iraq. Accurately estimating ETo is vital for effective water irrigation management and sustainable agriculture planning. However, the recommended method for estimating ETo, the FAO-PM method, requires various data inputs that may not always be readily available, especially in regions like Iraq. Therefore, this study assessed the performance of 40 empirical ETo models, categorized into radiation-based, mass-transfer-based, and temperature-based models, against the FAO-PM model in three major climatic zones of Iraq: the Mediterranean climate, the semiarid region, and the arid desert. The study found that the Rohwer mass-transfer method showed the best performance in estimating ETo for two-thirds of Iraq. The Penman and Caprio models also performed well in estimating ETo in specific areas. The study revealed that the choice of the ETo model varied depending on the climatic zone. The Caprio model performed best for radiation-based estimation in the arid desert, whereas the Kharrufa model was most effective for temperature-based estimation in the semiarid region and arid desert. Overall, the mass-transfer-based models outperformed other types of models in ETo estimation.
    • Download: (4.818Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Assessment of 40 Empirical Models for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration under the Three Major Climate Zones of Iraq

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296084
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAlaa Adel Jasim Al-Hasani
    contributor authorShamsuddin Shahid
    date accessioned2024-04-27T20:50:40Z
    date available2024-04-27T20:50:40Z
    date issued2023/11/01
    identifier other10.1061-JIDEDH.IRENG-10187.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296084
    description abstractAccurate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) estimation is crucial for water irrigation management and sustainable agriculture planning. The difficulty in obtaining several data requirements for employing the recommended Food and Agriculture Organization Penman-Monteith method (FAO-PM) for reliable estimation of ETo has led to the development of many empirical models. This is particularly crucial for Iraq, located in West Asia (29°15′00″–38°15′00″ N; 38°45′00″–48°45′00″ E), where meteorological data are often limited or missing. The objectives of the present study were to assess the performance of 40 ETo empirical models (13 radiation-based, 13 mass-transfer-based, and 14 temperature-based) against the FAO-PM model and identify alternative models with the minimal available data in three major climatic zones of Iraq: the Mediterranean climate (MCZ), semiarid (SCZ), and arid desert (ACZ). The recent ERA5 data set was adopted. The results indicate that (1) the Rohwer mass-transfer method is the best for estimating ETo for two-thirds of Iraq with a mean correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.97, mean Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) of 0.84, mean percent bias (PBIAS) of −8.92%, mean Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) of 0.92, and root mean square error (RMSE)-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) of 0.27, followed by the Penman (R2=0.90, KGE=0.75, NSE=0.77, RSR=0.46, and PBIAS=6.36%) and Caprio (R2=0.90, KGE=0.66, NSE=0.54, RSR=0.58, and PBIAS=24.64%) models; (2) Caprio is the best radiation-based model for estimating ETo, mainly in the ACZ, whereas Kharrufa is the best temperature-based model for estimating ETo, primarily in the SCZ and ACZ. Overall, the mass-transfer-based models performed better than other-based models for ETo estimation. The outcomes of this study provide a scientific reference for accurate ETo estimation using empirical models under limited data sets, which is valuable for irrigation management in Iraq. Accurately estimating ETo is vital for effective water irrigation management and sustainable agriculture planning. However, the recommended method for estimating ETo, the FAO-PM method, requires various data inputs that may not always be readily available, especially in regions like Iraq. Therefore, this study assessed the performance of 40 empirical ETo models, categorized into radiation-based, mass-transfer-based, and temperature-based models, against the FAO-PM model in three major climatic zones of Iraq: the Mediterranean climate, the semiarid region, and the arid desert. The study found that the Rohwer mass-transfer method showed the best performance in estimating ETo for two-thirds of Iraq. The Penman and Caprio models also performed well in estimating ETo in specific areas. The study revealed that the choice of the ETo model varied depending on the climatic zone. The Caprio model performed best for radiation-based estimation in the arid desert, whereas the Kharrufa model was most effective for temperature-based estimation in the semiarid region and arid desert. Overall, the mass-transfer-based models outperformed other types of models in ETo estimation.
    publisherASCE
    titleAssessment of 40 Empirical Models for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration under the Three Major Climate Zones of Iraq
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume149
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10187
    journal fristpage04023025-1
    journal lastpage04023025-21
    page21
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian