Show simple item record

contributor authorSinghose, William
date accessioned2024-04-24T22:45:31Z
date available2024-04-24T22:45:31Z
date copyright4/2/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2024
identifier issn2332-9017
identifier otherrisk_010_03_034502.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295821
description abstractAs the height of telescoping-boom aerial lifts increase, the severity of tip-over accidents obviously increases. To reduce the probability of tip-over accidents, manufacturers use countermeasures such as outriggers and wheel axels that expand in width to provide a more stable base, counterweights to offset the moments generated by the telescoping boom, and controllers that limit the machine configurations to within stable envelopes. The size of stability margins is determined by industry standards that set the approved load capacity of the machine to less than the load that would induce tip-over. This paper investigates the effectiveness of such load-based safety margins for very tall aerial lifts with telescoping-booms. The results indicate that the industry standards result in both inconsistent and often low safety margins.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleDiminishing Safety Margins of Telescoping-Boom Aerial Lifts
typeJournal Paper
journal volume10
journal issue3
journal titleASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg
identifier doi10.1115/1.4065028
journal fristpage34502-1
journal lastpage34502-7
page7
treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2024:;volume( 010 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record