Show simple item record

contributor authorMorin, Pauline
contributor authorMuller, Antoine
contributor authorDumont, Georges
contributor authorPontonnier, Charles
date accessioned2024-04-24T22:25:41Z
date available2024-04-24T22:25:41Z
date copyright11/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
date issued2023
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_146_01_014503.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295198
description abstractForce platforms often limit the analysis of human movement to the laboratory. Promising methods for estimating ground reaction forces and moments (GRF&M) can overcome this limitation. The most effective family of methods consists of minimizing a cost, constrained by the subject's dynamic equilibrium, for distributing the force over the contact surface on the ground. The detection of contact surfaces over time is dependent on numerous parameters. This study proposes to evaluate two contact detection methods: the first based on foot kinematics and the second based on pressure sole data. Optimal parameters for these two methods were identified for walking, running, and sidestep cut tasks. The results show that a single threshold in position or velocity is sufficient to guarantee a good estimate. Using pressure sole data to detect contact improves the estimation of the position of the center of pressure (CoP). Both methods demonstrated a similar level of accuracy in estimating ground reaction forces.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Two Contact Detection Methods for Ground Reaction Forces and Moment Estimation During Sidestep Cuts, Runs, and Walks
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4064034
journal fristpage14503-1
journal lastpage14503-8
page8
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2023:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record