YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rutting Resistance Evaluation of Highly Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binder and Mixes Using Different Performance Parameters

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 008::page 04023266-1
    Author:
    Bharat Rajan
    ,
    Arpita Suchismita
    ,
    Dharamveer Singh
    DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15194
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This study focused on evaluating the rutting performance of three different highly polymer-modified asphalt (HiMA) binders (i.e., O, T and B) using binder-based [i.e., multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) and force ductility (FD)] and mix-based [flow number (FN) and Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT)] rutting performance tests. The binder-based rutting indicators were compared with mix rutting performance to determine a parameter that can help in the correct prediction of HiMA rutting resistance. In addition, the study looked into application of a simple performance test, the indirect rutting tolerance index (IDEAL-RT), for HiMA mix rutting prediction. The MSCR test revealed different rankings of recovery at 0.1- and 3.2-kPa stress levels. Moreover, the T and B binders did not satisfy the stress sensitivity criteria (Jnr_difference) of Max 75%. The force ductility tests revealed that the peak force observed for polymer network phase in HiMA was significantly higher than base binder stiffness, which is in contrast with force distribution in polymer-modified binders (PMBs). The mix rutting resistance ranking (O>T>B) was similar in all the tests (i.e., FN, HWTT, and IDEAL-RT). Although IDEAL-RT can be used to compare the rutting resistances of HiMA mixes, detailed future work is required to establish its acceptability in comparing various types of mixes and the minimum requirements of RTIndex. The comparison between binder and mix rutting indicators demonstrated that MSCR testing on binder at stress levels of 6.4 kPa and higher can be used to predict the rutting resistance of HiMA binders. Parameters like slope and cohesion energy and a newly introduced parameter—work done for polymer activation (WPA)—from FD tests can be used to determine the polymeric phase dominance in HiMA binders. Overall, this study provides pavement stakeholders with a framework for rightly predicting the rutting resistance and polymeric phase dominance of HiMA binders and mixes using MSCR, FD, and IDEAL-RT tests.
    • Download: (1.717Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rutting Resistance Evaluation of Highly Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binder and Mixes Using Different Performance Parameters

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293793
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBharat Rajan
    contributor authorArpita Suchismita
    contributor authorDharamveer Singh
    date accessioned2023-11-27T23:43:33Z
    date available2023-11-27T23:43:33Z
    date issued5/31/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023-05-31
    identifier otherJMCEE7.MTENG-15194.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293793
    description abstractThis study focused on evaluating the rutting performance of three different highly polymer-modified asphalt (HiMA) binders (i.e., O, T and B) using binder-based [i.e., multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) and force ductility (FD)] and mix-based [flow number (FN) and Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT)] rutting performance tests. The binder-based rutting indicators were compared with mix rutting performance to determine a parameter that can help in the correct prediction of HiMA rutting resistance. In addition, the study looked into application of a simple performance test, the indirect rutting tolerance index (IDEAL-RT), for HiMA mix rutting prediction. The MSCR test revealed different rankings of recovery at 0.1- and 3.2-kPa stress levels. Moreover, the T and B binders did not satisfy the stress sensitivity criteria (Jnr_difference) of Max 75%. The force ductility tests revealed that the peak force observed for polymer network phase in HiMA was significantly higher than base binder stiffness, which is in contrast with force distribution in polymer-modified binders (PMBs). The mix rutting resistance ranking (O>T>B) was similar in all the tests (i.e., FN, HWTT, and IDEAL-RT). Although IDEAL-RT can be used to compare the rutting resistances of HiMA mixes, detailed future work is required to establish its acceptability in comparing various types of mixes and the minimum requirements of RTIndex. The comparison between binder and mix rutting indicators demonstrated that MSCR testing on binder at stress levels of 6.4 kPa and higher can be used to predict the rutting resistance of HiMA binders. Parameters like slope and cohesion energy and a newly introduced parameter—work done for polymer activation (WPA)—from FD tests can be used to determine the polymeric phase dominance in HiMA binders. Overall, this study provides pavement stakeholders with a framework for rightly predicting the rutting resistance and polymeric phase dominance of HiMA binders and mixes using MSCR, FD, and IDEAL-RT tests.
    publisherASCE
    titleRutting Resistance Evaluation of Highly Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binder and Mixes Using Different Performance Parameters
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume35
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15194
    journal fristpage04023266-1
    journal lastpage04023266-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian