YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Strategies and Techniques of Life Cycle–Embodied Carbon Reduction from the Building and Construction Sector: A Review

    Source: Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 003::page 04023017-1
    Author:
    Ming Hu
    DOI: 10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1591
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Compared with well-studied techniques for reducing operational carbon in the building industry, studies on strategies for reducing embodied carbon, as well as their effectiveness, are limited. Therefore, this article aims to address this gap by conducting a systematic review, bibliometric analysis, and meta-analysis of the available evidence to answer the following research questions: What tested and validated mitigation strategies and techniques exist? What are their effectiveness and suitable application? Initially, 410 publications were found, and 21 articles were reviewed systematically in the fields of embodied carbon mitigation and reduction. In total, 19 mitigation strategies in four categories were identified from the existing literature, which were discussed through a meta-analysis on the available data. The four categories are design optimization, material optimization, construction optimization, and infrastructure optimization. The results revealed that no single mitigation strategy alone can tackle the problem; rather, an integrated and combined approach is necessary. The meta-analysis indicated that the most effective techniques are within the design optimization (an average 37% reduction) and material optimization categories (an average 37% reduction). The review also revealed the incomplete nature of the reduction assessment from a life cycle perspective. Most studies assess only the material and manufacturing stages, often completely overlooking embodied emissions occurring during the construction, use stage, and end-of-life stage; therefore, the accuracy and comprehensiveness of such study results are questionable.
    • Download: (1.116Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Strategies and Techniques of Life Cycle–Embodied Carbon Reduction from the Building and Construction Sector: A Review

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293307
    Collections
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMing Hu
    date accessioned2023-11-27T23:07:20Z
    date available2023-11-27T23:07:20Z
    date issued9/1/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023-09-01
    identifier otherJAEIED.AEENG-1591.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293307
    description abstractCompared with well-studied techniques for reducing operational carbon in the building industry, studies on strategies for reducing embodied carbon, as well as their effectiveness, are limited. Therefore, this article aims to address this gap by conducting a systematic review, bibliometric analysis, and meta-analysis of the available evidence to answer the following research questions: What tested and validated mitigation strategies and techniques exist? What are their effectiveness and suitable application? Initially, 410 publications were found, and 21 articles were reviewed systematically in the fields of embodied carbon mitigation and reduction. In total, 19 mitigation strategies in four categories were identified from the existing literature, which were discussed through a meta-analysis on the available data. The four categories are design optimization, material optimization, construction optimization, and infrastructure optimization. The results revealed that no single mitigation strategy alone can tackle the problem; rather, an integrated and combined approach is necessary. The meta-analysis indicated that the most effective techniques are within the design optimization (an average 37% reduction) and material optimization categories (an average 37% reduction). The review also revealed the incomplete nature of the reduction assessment from a life cycle perspective. Most studies assess only the material and manufacturing stages, often completely overlooking embodied emissions occurring during the construction, use stage, and end-of-life stage; therefore, the accuracy and comprehensiveness of such study results are questionable.
    publisherASCE
    titleStrategies and Techniques of Life Cycle–Embodied Carbon Reduction from the Building and Construction Sector: A Review
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume29
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1591
    journal fristpage04023017-1
    journal lastpage04023017-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian