YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Life Cycle Risk Management Framework for Green Building Project Stakeholders

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 039 ):;issue: 004::page 04023022-1
    Author:
    Kerim Koc
    ,
    Handan Kunkcu
    ,
    Asli Pelin Gurgun
    DOI: 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5361
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The construction industry compromises the sustainability of the built environment because of its adverse impacts on the environment, economy, and society. In response, green building (GB) projects advocate for targeted sustainability goals while some particular risks in GB projects could cause several unfavorable outcomes. This study aims to assess the life cycle risks of GB projects and emphasize the role of stakeholders in the management of corresponding risks in a four-step analysis procedure. In the first two steps, a comprehensive literature review and focus-group discussion were employed to construct the decision-making framework suitable to the GB life cycle. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used to prioritize the identified risks based on expert opinions. The fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to associate stakeholders’ role with the management of GB risks that might arise throughout GB projects. Findings indicate that lack of experienced green construction staff, limited availability and reliability of green subcontractors and suppliers for the specific requirements of GB, and inflation of green materials’ prices are ranked as the most significant risks. A generic life cycle risk management framework for green buildings was developed to analyze the most significant risks and corresponding stakeholders. By addressing the gap in the literature, this study is expected to engage practitioners and GB project stakeholders for more effective and robust risk management frameworks.
    • Download: (1.204Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Life Cycle Risk Management Framework for Green Building Project Stakeholders

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293092
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKerim Koc
    contributor authorHandan Kunkcu
    contributor authorAsli Pelin Gurgun
    date accessioned2023-08-16T19:18:59Z
    date available2023-08-16T19:18:59Z
    date issued2023/07/01
    identifier otherJMENEA.MEENG-5361.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293092
    description abstractThe construction industry compromises the sustainability of the built environment because of its adverse impacts on the environment, economy, and society. In response, green building (GB) projects advocate for targeted sustainability goals while some particular risks in GB projects could cause several unfavorable outcomes. This study aims to assess the life cycle risks of GB projects and emphasize the role of stakeholders in the management of corresponding risks in a four-step analysis procedure. In the first two steps, a comprehensive literature review and focus-group discussion were employed to construct the decision-making framework suitable to the GB life cycle. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used to prioritize the identified risks based on expert opinions. The fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to associate stakeholders’ role with the management of GB risks that might arise throughout GB projects. Findings indicate that lack of experienced green construction staff, limited availability and reliability of green subcontractors and suppliers for the specific requirements of GB, and inflation of green materials’ prices are ranked as the most significant risks. A generic life cycle risk management framework for green buildings was developed to analyze the most significant risks and corresponding stakeholders. By addressing the gap in the literature, this study is expected to engage practitioners and GB project stakeholders for more effective and robust risk management frameworks.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleA Life Cycle Risk Management Framework for Green Building Project Stakeholders
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume39
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5361
    journal fristpage04023022-1
    journal lastpage04023022-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 039 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian