YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Identifying Critical Dispute Causes in the Construction Industry: A Cross-Regional Comparative Study between China and the UK

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 039 ):;issue: 002::page 04022072-1
    Author:
    Jinpeng Wang
    ,
    Shang Zhang
    ,
    Ruoyu Jin
    ,
    Peter Fenn
    ,
    Dongwen Yu
    ,
    Lilin Zhao
    DOI: 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-4943
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Construction disputes have long been identified as epidemics in the construction industry worldwide, which has become a more serious problem due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies on the dispute causes have primarily focused on country- or region-specific contexts and hence the results cannot be generalized in solving this chronic problem in a broader construction project worldwide. This study aims to explore and evaluate the critical dispute causes in construction projects through a comparative study between China and the United Kingdom. A total of 33 common dispute causes were identified through a comprehensive literature review and further consolidated by pilot surveys in the two countries. An online questionnaire survey was administered among construction professionals in China and the United Kingdom, with 170 valid responses returned for data analysis. Principal component factor analysis, mean score ranking approach, quartile analysis, and Mann-Whitney U testing were employed to identify the most critical dispute causes. Similarities and differences were mapped between the two countries. It was found that the five most critical categories of dispute causes in the two territories are: delay-related problems, lack of communication, contractual problems, site conditions, and design problems. The importance of variation in quantities, breach of contract, misinterpretation of contractual terms and conditions, and poor contract management was perceived significantly differently by the respondents in China and the United Kingdom, whereas design defects and failure to make compensation for additional work were the most critical common dispute causes in both countries. The research provides important findings for both academics and practitioners to holistically understand the similarities and differences of dispute causes in China and the United Kingdom and aids in preventing disputes more effectively in the global construction industry.
    • Download: (940.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Identifying Critical Dispute Causes in the Construction Industry: A Cross-Regional Comparative Study between China and the UK

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293065
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJinpeng Wang
    contributor authorShang Zhang
    contributor authorRuoyu Jin
    contributor authorPeter Fenn
    contributor authorDongwen Yu
    contributor authorLilin Zhao
    date accessioned2023-08-16T19:17:59Z
    date available2023-08-16T19:17:59Z
    date issued2023/03/01
    identifier otherJMENEA.MEENG-4943.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293065
    description abstractConstruction disputes have long been identified as epidemics in the construction industry worldwide, which has become a more serious problem due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies on the dispute causes have primarily focused on country- or region-specific contexts and hence the results cannot be generalized in solving this chronic problem in a broader construction project worldwide. This study aims to explore and evaluate the critical dispute causes in construction projects through a comparative study between China and the United Kingdom. A total of 33 common dispute causes were identified through a comprehensive literature review and further consolidated by pilot surveys in the two countries. An online questionnaire survey was administered among construction professionals in China and the United Kingdom, with 170 valid responses returned for data analysis. Principal component factor analysis, mean score ranking approach, quartile analysis, and Mann-Whitney U testing were employed to identify the most critical dispute causes. Similarities and differences were mapped between the two countries. It was found that the five most critical categories of dispute causes in the two territories are: delay-related problems, lack of communication, contractual problems, site conditions, and design problems. The importance of variation in quantities, breach of contract, misinterpretation of contractual terms and conditions, and poor contract management was perceived significantly differently by the respondents in China and the United Kingdom, whereas design defects and failure to make compensation for additional work were the most critical common dispute causes in both countries. The research provides important findings for both academics and practitioners to holistically understand the similarities and differences of dispute causes in China and the United Kingdom and aids in preventing disputes more effectively in the global construction industry.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleIdentifying Critical Dispute Causes in the Construction Industry: A Cross-Regional Comparative Study between China and the UK
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume39
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-4943
    journal fristpage04022072-1
    journal lastpage04022072-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 039 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian