YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Automated Bridge Crack Detection Based on Improving Encoder–Decoder Network and Strip Pooling

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2023:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 002::page 04023004-1
    Author:
    Gang Li
    ,
    Zhongyuan Fang
    ,
    Al Mahbashi Mohammed
    ,
    Tong Liu
    ,
    Zhihao Deng
    DOI: 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2218
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The detection of bridge cracks is an important task in bridge maintenance. It can also reflect the health of the bridge. However, cracks are usually in the form of strips, which are different from the concrete surface. Most crack detection algorithms cannot adapt to this situation well. In this paper, the original image of bridge cracks is collected and the data set is obtained through image processing. A bridge crack detection method based on improving encoder-decoder and mixed pooling module is proposed in this article. The basic features of the crack images are extracted by an encoder with dilated convolution. In this way, the resolution of the feature image can be guaranteed, and large receptive field can be obtained. Then the feature picture through the mix pooling module, which helps to capture remote context information and establish a remote dependency. Finally, the decoder restores the picture to its original size and integrates the original features. In the comparison experiment with the same experimental conditions, we compared with the classic image segmentation methods such as PSPNet, U-Net, FCN, and DeepLabv3+. The results show that our method achieves 98.3%, 97.3%, 97.6%, and 84.5% in precision, recall, F1-score, and MIoU. The results show that our method does have certain advantages in the field of crack detection and segmentation.
    • Download: (2.995Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Automated Bridge Crack Detection Based on Improving Encoder–Decoder Network and Strip Pooling

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292855
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGang Li
    contributor authorZhongyuan Fang
    contributor authorAl Mahbashi Mohammed
    contributor authorTong Liu
    contributor authorZhihao Deng
    date accessioned2023-08-16T19:09:48Z
    date available2023-08-16T19:09:48Z
    date issued2023/06/01
    identifier otherJITSE4.ISENG-2218.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292855
    description abstractThe detection of bridge cracks is an important task in bridge maintenance. It can also reflect the health of the bridge. However, cracks are usually in the form of strips, which are different from the concrete surface. Most crack detection algorithms cannot adapt to this situation well. In this paper, the original image of bridge cracks is collected and the data set is obtained through image processing. A bridge crack detection method based on improving encoder-decoder and mixed pooling module is proposed in this article. The basic features of the crack images are extracted by an encoder with dilated convolution. In this way, the resolution of the feature image can be guaranteed, and large receptive field can be obtained. Then the feature picture through the mix pooling module, which helps to capture remote context information and establish a remote dependency. Finally, the decoder restores the picture to its original size and integrates the original features. In the comparison experiment with the same experimental conditions, we compared with the classic image segmentation methods such as PSPNet, U-Net, FCN, and DeepLabv3+. The results show that our method achieves 98.3%, 97.3%, 97.6%, and 84.5% in precision, recall, F1-score, and MIoU. The results show that our method does have certain advantages in the field of crack detection and segmentation.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAutomated Bridge Crack Detection Based on Improving Encoder–Decoder Network and Strip Pooling
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume29
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2218
    journal fristpage04023004-1
    journal lastpage04023004-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2023:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian