Comparison of Data-Driven Groundwater Recharge Estimates with a Process-Based Model for a River Basin in the Southeastern USASource: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 007::page 04023019-1DOI: 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5882Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Reliable estimates of aquifer recharge have the potential to help develop sustainable groundwater management policies. Despite its importance, quantifying this flux continues to be a challenge and remains one of the most uncertain components of the hydrological cycle. Here, we obtain a spatially explicit estimate of recharge using a semi-distributed hydrologic model for a major river basin in the Southeastern United States. A comparison of these process-based estimates with a data-driven recharge product (developed by USGS), which was obtained using a set of empirical regression equations, shows good agreement at the basin scale, but significant discrepancies at finer spatial resolutions. Overall, the semi-distributed model shows a higher degree of spatial heterogeneity across the basin than the USGS study results, which likely indicates that the empirical relationships modeled at the basin scale by the USGS empirical equations might not hold at smaller spatial scales. However, more ground-truthing recharge datasets are necessary to properly evaluate subbasin-scale models and reduce the uncertainty of estimates at these scales. Groundwater recharge information at local scales is essential for various tasks: It is critical in the assessment of groundwater contamination from point sources, determining rates of change in response to pumping, quantifying local scale climate-induced storage change effects, assessing climate impacts on land cover changes and water supply, to name a few (Scanlon and Cook 2002) (Reitz et al. 2017). Because precipitation, pumping rates, land cover changes, and other important factors that affect groundwater recharge can vary significantly at a local scale (on the order of 1 to 10 km2), having recharge estimates at a similarly fine scale will be useful for groundwater managers to evaluate the effectiveness of various practices that impact different stakeholders within the basin, and use this information to develop more effective water management plans.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Mauricio Osorio Gonzalez | |
contributor author | Pooja Preetha | |
contributor author | Mukesh Kumar | |
contributor author | T. Prabhakar Clement | |
date accessioned | 2023-08-16T19:08:15Z | |
date available | 2023-08-16T19:08:15Z | |
date issued | 2023/07/01 | |
identifier other | JHYEFF.HEENG-5882.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292812 | |
description abstract | Reliable estimates of aquifer recharge have the potential to help develop sustainable groundwater management policies. Despite its importance, quantifying this flux continues to be a challenge and remains one of the most uncertain components of the hydrological cycle. Here, we obtain a spatially explicit estimate of recharge using a semi-distributed hydrologic model for a major river basin in the Southeastern United States. A comparison of these process-based estimates with a data-driven recharge product (developed by USGS), which was obtained using a set of empirical regression equations, shows good agreement at the basin scale, but significant discrepancies at finer spatial resolutions. Overall, the semi-distributed model shows a higher degree of spatial heterogeneity across the basin than the USGS study results, which likely indicates that the empirical relationships modeled at the basin scale by the USGS empirical equations might not hold at smaller spatial scales. However, more ground-truthing recharge datasets are necessary to properly evaluate subbasin-scale models and reduce the uncertainty of estimates at these scales. Groundwater recharge information at local scales is essential for various tasks: It is critical in the assessment of groundwater contamination from point sources, determining rates of change in response to pumping, quantifying local scale climate-induced storage change effects, assessing climate impacts on land cover changes and water supply, to name a few (Scanlon and Cook 2002) (Reitz et al. 2017). Because precipitation, pumping rates, land cover changes, and other important factors that affect groundwater recharge can vary significantly at a local scale (on the order of 1 to 10 km2), having recharge estimates at a similarly fine scale will be useful for groundwater managers to evaluate the effectiveness of various practices that impact different stakeholders within the basin, and use this information to develop more effective water management plans. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Comparison of Data-Driven Groundwater Recharge Estimates with a Process-Based Model for a River Basin in the Southeastern USA | |
type | Journal Article | |
journal volume | 28 | |
journal issue | 7 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5882 | |
journal fristpage | 04023019-1 | |
journal lastpage | 04023019-9 | |
page | 9 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 007 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |