YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Data-Driven Groundwater Recharge Estimates with a Process-Based Model for a River Basin in the Southeastern USA

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 007::page 04023019-1
    Author:
    Mauricio Osorio Gonzalez
    ,
    Pooja Preetha
    ,
    Mukesh Kumar
    ,
    T. Prabhakar Clement
    DOI: 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5882
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Reliable estimates of aquifer recharge have the potential to help develop sustainable groundwater management policies. Despite its importance, quantifying this flux continues to be a challenge and remains one of the most uncertain components of the hydrological cycle. Here, we obtain a spatially explicit estimate of recharge using a semi-distributed hydrologic model for a major river basin in the Southeastern United States. A comparison of these process-based estimates with a data-driven recharge product (developed by USGS), which was obtained using a set of empirical regression equations, shows good agreement at the basin scale, but significant discrepancies at finer spatial resolutions. Overall, the semi-distributed model shows a higher degree of spatial heterogeneity across the basin than the USGS study results, which likely indicates that the empirical relationships modeled at the basin scale by the USGS empirical equations might not hold at smaller spatial scales. However, more ground-truthing recharge datasets are necessary to properly evaluate subbasin-scale models and reduce the uncertainty of estimates at these scales. Groundwater recharge information at local scales is essential for various tasks: It is critical in the assessment of groundwater contamination from point sources, determining rates of change in response to pumping, quantifying local scale climate-induced storage change effects, assessing climate impacts on land cover changes and water supply, to name a few (Scanlon and Cook 2002) (Reitz et al. 2017). Because precipitation, pumping rates, land cover changes, and other important factors that affect groundwater recharge can vary significantly at a local scale (on the order of 1 to 10  km2), having recharge estimates at a similarly fine scale will be useful for groundwater managers to evaluate the effectiveness of various practices that impact different stakeholders within the basin, and use this information to develop more effective water management plans.
    • Download: (3.487Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Data-Driven Groundwater Recharge Estimates with a Process-Based Model for a River Basin in the Southeastern USA

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292812
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMauricio Osorio Gonzalez
    contributor authorPooja Preetha
    contributor authorMukesh Kumar
    contributor authorT. Prabhakar Clement
    date accessioned2023-08-16T19:08:15Z
    date available2023-08-16T19:08:15Z
    date issued2023/07/01
    identifier otherJHYEFF.HEENG-5882.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292812
    description abstractReliable estimates of aquifer recharge have the potential to help develop sustainable groundwater management policies. Despite its importance, quantifying this flux continues to be a challenge and remains one of the most uncertain components of the hydrological cycle. Here, we obtain a spatially explicit estimate of recharge using a semi-distributed hydrologic model for a major river basin in the Southeastern United States. A comparison of these process-based estimates with a data-driven recharge product (developed by USGS), which was obtained using a set of empirical regression equations, shows good agreement at the basin scale, but significant discrepancies at finer spatial resolutions. Overall, the semi-distributed model shows a higher degree of spatial heterogeneity across the basin than the USGS study results, which likely indicates that the empirical relationships modeled at the basin scale by the USGS empirical equations might not hold at smaller spatial scales. However, more ground-truthing recharge datasets are necessary to properly evaluate subbasin-scale models and reduce the uncertainty of estimates at these scales. Groundwater recharge information at local scales is essential for various tasks: It is critical in the assessment of groundwater contamination from point sources, determining rates of change in response to pumping, quantifying local scale climate-induced storage change effects, assessing climate impacts on land cover changes and water supply, to name a few (Scanlon and Cook 2002) (Reitz et al. 2017). Because precipitation, pumping rates, land cover changes, and other important factors that affect groundwater recharge can vary significantly at a local scale (on the order of 1 to 10  km2), having recharge estimates at a similarly fine scale will be useful for groundwater managers to evaluate the effectiveness of various practices that impact different stakeholders within the basin, and use this information to develop more effective water management plans.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Data-Driven Groundwater Recharge Estimates with a Process-Based Model for a River Basin in the Southeastern USA
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume28
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5882
    journal fristpage04023019-1
    journal lastpage04023019-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian