Show simple item record

contributor authorCool, Vanessa
contributor authorVan Belle, Lucas
contributor authorClaeys, Claus
contributor authorDeckers, Elke
contributor authorDesmet, Wim
date accessioned2023-08-16T18:12:13Z
date available2023-08-16T18:12:13Z
date copyright9/13/2022 12:00:00 AM
date issued2022
identifier issn1048-9002
identifier othervib_145_1_017001.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291610
description abstractIn the original publication, the captions of Figs. 4 and 5 are correct, but the graphs have been erroneously switched between both figures. In the corrected version below, Fig. 4 correctly shows the result of the lattice-based UC in which the computation times of the ROMs exceed the computation time of the FOM, while Fig. 5 correctly shows the results of the shifted UC in which the computation times of the ROMs are significantly smaller than the computation time of the FOM.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleErratum: “Impact of the Unit Cell Choice on the Efficiency of Dispersion Curve Calculations Using GBMS” [ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 144(2), p. 024501; DOI: 10.1115/1.4051817]
typeJournal Paper
journal volume145
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Vibration and Acoustics
identifier doi10.1115/1.4055410
journal fristpage17001-1
journal lastpage17001-2
page2
treeJournal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2022:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record