Show simple item record

contributor authorDawoud, Michael
contributor authorBeitler, Stephan
contributor authorSchwarze, Hubert
date accessioned2023-08-16T18:03:11Z
date available2023-08-16T18:03:11Z
date copyright11/10/2022 12:00:00 AM
date issued2022
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier othertrib_145_2_021203.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291306
description abstractThe slip behavior of four cage types was studied for an NU215 cylindrical roller bearing under radial forces lower than the minimum recommended by the manufacturer by performing force, speed, and oil flow ramp tests. In comparison, a specially designed full complement bearing was also tested as an alternative to the caged bearing variant. All the tested bearings started to operate slip-free at higher forces than those recommended by the bearing manufacturers. In addition to that, the increase in oil flowrate or rotational speed would increase the set slip under insufficient radial forces. Single-part outer-ring-guided brass cage experienced lower slip than its two-part equivalent while roller guidance possessed the least slip tendency among the tested cages. The polyamide cage offered the lightest weight reduction at the expense of a higher slip, whereas the full complement bearings also offer higher load-carrying capacity at the expense of higher slip.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleSlip Characteristics in Cylindrical Roller Bearings. Part I: Influence of Cage Type on Rolling Set Slip
typeJournal Paper
journal volume145
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4055555
journal fristpage21203-1
journal lastpage21203-16
page16
treeJournal of Tribology:;2022:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record