Evaluating Tropical Precipitation Relations in CMIP6 Models with ARM DataSource: Journal of Climate:;2022:;volume( 035 ):;issue: 019::page 2743Author:Todd Emmenegger
,
Yi-Hung Kuo
,
Shaocheng Xie
,
Chengzhu Zhang
,
Cheng Tao
,
J. David Neelin
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0386.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: A set of diagnostics based on simple, statistical relationships between precipitation and the thermodynamic environment in observations is implemented to assess phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) model behavior with respect to precipitation. Observational data from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) permanent field observational sites are augmented with satellite observations of precipitation and temperature as an observational baseline. A robust relationship across observational datasets between column water vapor (CWV) and precipitation, in which conditionally averaged precipitation exhibits a sharp pickup at some critical CWV value, provides a useful convective onset diagnostic for climate model comparison. While a few models reproduce an appropriate precipitation pickup, most models begin their pickup at too low CWV and the increase in precipitation with increasing CWV is too weak. Convective transition statistics compiled in column relative humidity (CRH) partially compensate for model temperature biases—although imperfectly since the temperature dependence is more complex than that of column saturation. Significant errors remain in individual models and weak pickups are generally not improved. The conditional-average precipitation as a function of CRH can be decomposed into the product of the probability of raining and mean precipitation during raining times (conditional intensity). The pickup behavior is primarily dependent on the probability of raining near the transition and on the conditional intensity at higher CRH. Most models roughly capture the CRH dependence of these two factors. However, compensating biases often occur: model conditional intensity that is too low at a given CRH is compensated in part by excessive probability of precipitation.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Todd Emmenegger | |
contributor author | Yi-Hung Kuo | |
contributor author | Shaocheng Xie | |
contributor author | Chengzhu Zhang | |
contributor author | Cheng Tao | |
contributor author | J. David Neelin | |
date accessioned | 2023-04-12T18:34:52Z | |
date available | 2023-04-12T18:34:52Z | |
date copyright | 2022/09/14 | |
date issued | 2022 | |
identifier other | JCLI-D-21-0386.1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289913 | |
description abstract | A set of diagnostics based on simple, statistical relationships between precipitation and the thermodynamic environment in observations is implemented to assess phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) model behavior with respect to precipitation. Observational data from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) permanent field observational sites are augmented with satellite observations of precipitation and temperature as an observational baseline. A robust relationship across observational datasets between column water vapor (CWV) and precipitation, in which conditionally averaged precipitation exhibits a sharp pickup at some critical CWV value, provides a useful convective onset diagnostic for climate model comparison. While a few models reproduce an appropriate precipitation pickup, most models begin their pickup at too low CWV and the increase in precipitation with increasing CWV is too weak. Convective transition statistics compiled in column relative humidity (CRH) partially compensate for model temperature biases—although imperfectly since the temperature dependence is more complex than that of column saturation. Significant errors remain in individual models and weak pickups are generally not improved. The conditional-average precipitation as a function of CRH can be decomposed into the product of the probability of raining and mean precipitation during raining times (conditional intensity). The pickup behavior is primarily dependent on the probability of raining near the transition and on the conditional intensity at higher CRH. Most models roughly capture the CRH dependence of these two factors. However, compensating biases often occur: model conditional intensity that is too low at a given CRH is compensated in part by excessive probability of precipitation. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Evaluating Tropical Precipitation Relations in CMIP6 Models with ARM Data | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 35 | |
journal issue | 19 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0386.1 | |
journal fristpage | 2743 | |
journal lastpage | 2760 | |
page | 2743–2760 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2022:;volume( 035 ):;issue: 019 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |