YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Eight Cycles of Facade Inspection in New York City

    Source: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2022:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 004::page 04022050
    Author:
    Dan Eschenasy
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000716
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Since the enactment of the first New York City (NYC) facade inspection ordinance in 1980, eight five-year complete cycles have been registered. The paper is a commentary on the 40-year years’ evolution of the practice of facade inspection and repair as influenced by technical developments, changes in legislation and building owners’ attitudes. The large number of number of buildings (by now 16,000) and the number of cycles made NYC the principal terrain where methods of inspection and repair techniques were tested. The interpretation of the law was refined by rules issued in response to recurring failures. In 1980, there were few professionals knowledgeable of the causes of facade distress and effective repair methods. Gradually, the various types of facade distress found explanations and adequate repair solutions were developed; a professional specialty dedicated to facade conditions has reached maturity. The author supports the arguments with various descriptive statistics of inspection ratings, violations, applications to repair, all corelated with the NYC typologies. A quantitative proof of success could not be deduced from an analysis of inspection ratings of four successive cycles, as the rating definitions have evolved over the last 20 years. A reduction in number of decaying facades is noticeable, but accidents have continued to occur. The public awareness and concerns about the risks posed by facades has increased and as expectations remain high, the scope of the Facade Inspection and Safety Program (FISP) has evolved from minimizing the number of accidents to a timely protection from hazards.
    • Download: (310.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Eight Cycles of Facade Inspection in New York City

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289362
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDan Eschenasy
    date accessioned2023-04-07T00:35:57Z
    date available2023-04-07T00:35:57Z
    date issued2022/11/01
    identifier other%28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000716.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289362
    description abstractSince the enactment of the first New York City (NYC) facade inspection ordinance in 1980, eight five-year complete cycles have been registered. The paper is a commentary on the 40-year years’ evolution of the practice of facade inspection and repair as influenced by technical developments, changes in legislation and building owners’ attitudes. The large number of number of buildings (by now 16,000) and the number of cycles made NYC the principal terrain where methods of inspection and repair techniques were tested. The interpretation of the law was refined by rules issued in response to recurring failures. In 1980, there were few professionals knowledgeable of the causes of facade distress and effective repair methods. Gradually, the various types of facade distress found explanations and adequate repair solutions were developed; a professional specialty dedicated to facade conditions has reached maturity. The author supports the arguments with various descriptive statistics of inspection ratings, violations, applications to repair, all corelated with the NYC typologies. A quantitative proof of success could not be deduced from an analysis of inspection ratings of four successive cycles, as the rating definitions have evolved over the last 20 years. A reduction in number of decaying facades is noticeable, but accidents have continued to occur. The public awareness and concerns about the risks posed by facades has increased and as expectations remain high, the scope of the Facade Inspection and Safety Program (FISP) has evolved from minimizing the number of accidents to a timely protection from hazards.
    publisherASCE
    titleEight Cycles of Facade Inspection in New York City
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume27
    journal issue4
    journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000716
    journal fristpage04022050
    journal lastpage04022050_13
    page13
    treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2022:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian