Show simple item record

contributor authorTrung-Tri Le
contributor authorSung-Sik Park
contributor authorSeung-Wook Woo
date accessioned2023-04-07T00:31:17Z
date available2023-04-07T00:31:17Z
date issued2022/12/01
identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002919.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289197
description abstractMany regions of the world have witnessed repeated earthquakes that have caused repeated liquefaction of soil. Therefore, the effect of repeated earthquakes on the dynamic behavior of soil is an important aspect that must be considered. In this study, a series of cyclic shear loading events and consolidation phases was repeated for loose sand to investigate the cyclic stress–strain response and postcyclic reconsolidation volumetric strain that are usually induced by repeated earthquakes. After an initial consolidation, samples were subjected to repeated cyclic shear loading events and subsequent reconsolidations in a cyclic direct simple shear (CDSS) device with various cyclic stress ratios (CSRs) under undrained conditions for nonliquefied and liquefied stages. Based on the test results, the number of cyclic shear events (Nev), built-up excess pore water pressure ratio (ru), CSR, and maximum double amplitude shear strain (γmaxDA) were shown to be the factors influencing the behavior of samples. For the samples that were not subjected to any prior liquefaction stage, the reliquefaction resistance continuously increased as Nev increased. For those subjected to repeated liquefaction, the samples presented cyclic liquefaction accompanied by high flow shear strain in the first event. The reliquefaction resistance drastically decreased in the second cyclic shear loading event as a result of the critical anisotropy induced by the first cyclic shear loading event when the contraction tendency prevailed. The samples showed cyclic mobility behavior from the fourth event onward, corresponding to the predominance of the dilation tendency. The obtained γmaxDA and εrcV increased as CSR and/or ru increased and decreased as Nev increased. The relative density (Dr) was not a major factor affecting the reliquefaction resistance; however, it might have promoted a lower induced anisotropy level, lower induced γmaxDA, lower εrcV, and the change in behavior of samples from cyclic liquefaction (contraction tendency) to cyclic mobility (dilation tendency). A higher contraction tendency in samples resulted in a higher γmaxDA and εrcV. The shear strain induced in the immediate-past cyclic shear loading event was found to be the main factor affecting εrcV. From the γmaxDA−εrcV relationship, two separate zones were observed, namely (1) noninduced flow shear strain; and (2) induced flow shear strain, regardless of CSR and Nev. Additionally, a relationship between γmaxDA and εrcV was proposed for practical applications.
publisherASCE
titleCyclic Response and Reconsolidation Volumetric Strain of Sand under Repeated Cyclic Shear Loading Events
typeJournal Article
journal volume148
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002919
journal fristpage04022109
journal lastpage04022109_23
page23
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record