Show simple item record

contributor authorFranklin R. Olaya
contributor authorJonathan D. Bray
date accessioned2023-04-07T00:30:55Z
date available2023-04-07T00:30:55Z
date issued2022/11/01
identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002896.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289183
description abstractSeveral widely used field methods for estimating postliquefaction ground deformation are based on the laboratory data from one series of cyclic simple shear tests performed on one uniform clean sand reconstituted to three relative densities. It is not clear if the trends of this one data set are applicable to other clean sands, nonplastic silty sands, and nonplastic silts. A database of 579 test results on postliquefaction volumetric strain, including 299 test results that relate maximum shear strain to the factor of safety against liquefaction triggering, was compiled and used to examine trends for these soils. The database includes postcyclic test data on 10 clean sands, 2 gravels, 3 silty sands, 5 silts, and 3 clayey soils. The enlarged cyclic testing database was used to develop models that estimate postliquefaction volumetric strain and maximum shear strain as a function of soil type, state, and seismic demand. The models are applicable to uniform nonplastic soil. The state parameter was used in addition to relative density and void ratio to characterize the state of the soil. Correlations between these parameters enable the full data set to inform the models.
publisherASCE
titleStrain Potential of Liquefied Soil
typeJournal Article
journal volume148
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002896
journal fristpage04022099
journal lastpage04022099_16
page16
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record