Show simple item record

contributor authorElishakoff, Isaac
date accessioned2023-04-06T13:02:46Z
date available2023-04-06T13:02:46Z
date copyright11/9/2022 12:00:00 AM
date issued2022
identifier issn10489002
identifier othervib_144_6_061012.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288977
description abstractIn this study, we investigate the importance of the fourthorder time derivative that appears in the equations derived by Jacques Antoine Charles Bresse in 1859, as well as in equations that were derived by Stephen Prokofievich Timoshenko and Paul Ehrenfest during years 1912 and 1913 and reported by Timoshenko in the 1916 book on the theory of elasticity in the Russian language and then in two papers dated 1920 and 1921, in English. The first part of the study demonstrates that Timoshenko and Ehrenfest did not overestimate the importance of the fourthorder derivative term in their equations. The second part deals with the debate on the socalled second spectrum attendant in the original set of equations. It is shown that in the truncated Timoshenko—Ehrenfest equations—which is asymptotically consistent with elasticity theory—“the second spectrum” issue does not arise. Thus, the two parts of this study are intricately interrelated with each other.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleDid S. P. Timoshenko and P. Ehrenfest Overestimate the Importance of the FourthOrder Time Derivative in Their Beam Theory?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Vibration and Acoustics
identifier doi10.1115/1.4055975
journal fristpage61012
journal lastpage610127
page7
treeJournal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record