Show simple item record

contributor authorWeiss, Abdullah G.;Zaidan, Laith J.;Bani Ahmad, Mohammad T. H.;Abdoelatef, M. Gomaa;Peterson, John W.;Lindsay, Alexander D.;Kong, Fande;Ahmed, Karim;Kimber, Mark L.
date accessioned2022-12-27T23:19:28Z
date available2022-12-27T23:19:28Z
date copyright6/15/2022 12:00:00 AM
date issued2022
identifier issn2332-8983
identifier otherners_009_02_021402.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288380
description abstractThe multiphysics object-oriented simulation environment (moose) is a code package that couples a variety of physics modules, allowing for highly accessible multiphysics simulations. The physics modules include a finite element Navier–Stokes (N–S) module that is designed to solve laminar fluid dynamics problems. The usage of this module in multiple recent studies coupled with the growing interest in moose for usage in nonlight water reactor safety studies by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) prompted the authors to investigate the computational fluid dynamics capabilities of moose. A two-dimensional laminar flow past a circular cylinder scenario is simulated in the moose framework to investigate the effectiveness of the N–S module. Simulations assumed an unsteady laminar flow with a Reynolds number of 200. To verify the results from moose, similar simulations were conducted using the well-utilized simulation of turbulent flow in arbitrary regions—computational continuum mechanics C++ (star-ccm+) finite volume code. Results from both codes are also compared to some results from literature. Velocity and pressure profiles of both transient simulations were compared. The numerical and input errors in moose are also visualized with contour plots to qualitatively understand the evolution of the errors across time and space. The comparisons between moose and star-ccm+ showed nearly perfect agreement between the codes for velocity and pressure, especially after the development of the vortex street in later time-steps. The force coefficients showed excellent agreement after the development of the vortex street, but demonstrated notable discrepancies prior to the vortex street development, which is likely due to how each code simulated the approach to the vortex street in earlier time-steps.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleCharacterization of the Finite Element Computational Fluid Dynamics Capabilities in the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
identifier doi10.1115/1.4054685
journal fristpage21402
journal lastpage21402_25
page25
treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2022:;volume( 009 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record