YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Runoff Control Performance by Five Permeable Pavement Systems in Zhenjiang, Yangtze River Delta of China

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 010::page 05022011
    Author:
    Qiongfang Li
    ,
    Zhengmo Zhou
    ,
    Jinbo Dong
    ,
    Yan Wang
    ,
    Meixiu Yu
    ,
    Qihui Chen
    ,
    Yao Du
    ,
    Pengfei He
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002202
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Urban stormwater management measures, such as permeable pavement systems (PPSs), have been widely implemented to alleviate increasingly severe urban water-related problems. However, the effectiveness of PPSs in runoff control under different rainfall conditions has not been fully investigated, particularly in China. Therefore, there is an urgent need to study the hydrological benefits of different PPSs in China. In this paper, five PPSs at the Zhenjiang sponge base, including one pervious concrete (PC), two permeable interlocking concrete pavements (PICP1 and PICP2), and two permeable bricks (PB1 and PB2), were selected as study cases. Surface runoff coefficients, underdrain runoff coefficients, total runoff volume reductions, and peak flow reductions during rainfall events throughout the flood seasons of 2019 and 2020 were calculated. The influence of rainfall characteristics, pavement type, and pavement age on PPS hydrological performance were evaluated by statistical analyses (p<0.05). The results revealed that the average values of surface runoff coefficients, underdrain runoff coefficients, total runoff volume reductions, and peak flow reductions by the PPSs were approximately 0.025, 0.003, 98.1%, and 96.4%, respectively, in 2019 and changed to 0.045, 0.001, 96.3%, and 92.4%, respectively, in 2020. PC performed best with regard to surface runoff control at the initial stage of operation, followed by PB and PICP. Both rainfall depth and rainfall intensity had a significant correlation with each hydrological performance metric. The increase in surface runoff generation from 2019 to 2020 mainly resulted from the clogging problem, which was closely related to pavement type and surroundings of PPSs. PB performed better than PC and PICP in terms of sustainable hydrological performance. The results provide a scientific reference for the design, construction, and operation of PPSs and can aid with the sustainable construction of sponge cities in China. This study evaluated the runoff reduction performance of five PPSs under natural rainfall events, which were observed during the flood seasons of 2019 and 2020 in Zhenjiang, Yangtze River Delta of China. In total, approximately 96% of the rainfall was captured by the PPSs during the monitoring period, and the PPSs performed better in lower-intensity rainfall events. However, the runoff reduction performance of the PPSs decreased markedly with operation time due to clogging, which is closely related to the pavement type and site surroundings of the PPS. To maintain the function of PPS for runoff control in a long period of time, the permeable brick system is the best type of PPS compared with PC systems and PICP systems. The results indicated that the application of PPSs in sponge city construction could be beneficial in the mitigation of urban floods, and adequate attention should be paid to the clogging problem of PPSs at every stage of PPS design, construction, and operation.
    • Download: (2.011Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Runoff Control Performance by Five Permeable Pavement Systems in Zhenjiang, Yangtze River Delta of China

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287690
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQiongfang Li
    contributor authorZhengmo Zhou
    contributor authorJinbo Dong
    contributor authorYan Wang
    contributor authorMeixiu Yu
    contributor authorQihui Chen
    contributor authorYao Du
    contributor authorPengfei He
    date accessioned2022-12-27T20:38:06Z
    date available2022-12-27T20:38:06Z
    date issued2022/10/01
    identifier other(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002202.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287690
    description abstractUrban stormwater management measures, such as permeable pavement systems (PPSs), have been widely implemented to alleviate increasingly severe urban water-related problems. However, the effectiveness of PPSs in runoff control under different rainfall conditions has not been fully investigated, particularly in China. Therefore, there is an urgent need to study the hydrological benefits of different PPSs in China. In this paper, five PPSs at the Zhenjiang sponge base, including one pervious concrete (PC), two permeable interlocking concrete pavements (PICP1 and PICP2), and two permeable bricks (PB1 and PB2), were selected as study cases. Surface runoff coefficients, underdrain runoff coefficients, total runoff volume reductions, and peak flow reductions during rainfall events throughout the flood seasons of 2019 and 2020 were calculated. The influence of rainfall characteristics, pavement type, and pavement age on PPS hydrological performance were evaluated by statistical analyses (p<0.05). The results revealed that the average values of surface runoff coefficients, underdrain runoff coefficients, total runoff volume reductions, and peak flow reductions by the PPSs were approximately 0.025, 0.003, 98.1%, and 96.4%, respectively, in 2019 and changed to 0.045, 0.001, 96.3%, and 92.4%, respectively, in 2020. PC performed best with regard to surface runoff control at the initial stage of operation, followed by PB and PICP. Both rainfall depth and rainfall intensity had a significant correlation with each hydrological performance metric. The increase in surface runoff generation from 2019 to 2020 mainly resulted from the clogging problem, which was closely related to pavement type and surroundings of PPSs. PB performed better than PC and PICP in terms of sustainable hydrological performance. The results provide a scientific reference for the design, construction, and operation of PPSs and can aid with the sustainable construction of sponge cities in China. This study evaluated the runoff reduction performance of five PPSs under natural rainfall events, which were observed during the flood seasons of 2019 and 2020 in Zhenjiang, Yangtze River Delta of China. In total, approximately 96% of the rainfall was captured by the PPSs during the monitoring period, and the PPSs performed better in lower-intensity rainfall events. However, the runoff reduction performance of the PPSs decreased markedly with operation time due to clogging, which is closely related to the pavement type and site surroundings of the PPS. To maintain the function of PPS for runoff control in a long period of time, the permeable brick system is the best type of PPS compared with PC systems and PICP systems. The results indicated that the application of PPSs in sponge city construction could be beneficial in the mitigation of urban floods, and adequate attention should be paid to the clogging problem of PPSs at every stage of PPS design, construction, and operation.
    publisherASCE
    titleComparison of Runoff Control Performance by Five Permeable Pavement Systems in Zhenjiang, Yangtze River Delta of China
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume27
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002202
    journal fristpage05022011
    journal lastpage05022011_13
    page13
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian