YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Seismic Performance of M-Section Cold-Formed Thin-Walled Steel-Reinforced Concrete Wall

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 009::page 04022144
    Author:
    Guowei Zhang
    ,
    Qiaoqiao Fan
    ,
    Zheng Lu
    ,
    Dongxu Qiao
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003453
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: To overcome the shortcomings of traditional shear walls, structure systems have been proposed and investigated. One such structure system is a steel-reinforced concrete shear wall, which has certain desirable properties such as good load-bearing capacity, stiffness, and seismic performance. This paper proposes an M-section cold-formed thin-walled steel reinforced concrete (MCTSR) shear wall, which uses M-section cold-formed thin-walled steel to function as reinforcements. Six specimens with different permanent formwork types, axial compression ratios, reinforcement diameters, and other parameters were tested under cyclic loading to investigate seismic performance. The results demonstrate that various types of permanent formwork, including cement fibrolite plate, metal lathing, and polystyrene board can meet the requirement of related seismic design codes, construction demand, and assembly requirements, and have no obvious impact on the ultimate load-bearing capacity, lateral stiffness, and stiffness degradation rate. However, it changes the energy dissipation capacity and ductility, which are two important indexes to evaluate seismic performance in engineering practice. The failure mechanism and the influence of axial compression ratio, reinforcement diameter, and space between reinforcements are discussed. The shear-strength equations proposed by various countries’ or regions’ codes were analyzed, which can be used as a reference for related engineers and designers. Finite-element models for MCTSR shear walls were established for further investigation.
    • Download: (8.793Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Seismic Performance of M-Section Cold-Formed Thin-Walled Steel-Reinforced Concrete Wall

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286744
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGuowei Zhang
    contributor authorQiaoqiao Fan
    contributor authorZheng Lu
    contributor authorDongxu Qiao
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:31:08Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:31:08Z
    date issued2022/07/15
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0003453.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286744
    description abstractTo overcome the shortcomings of traditional shear walls, structure systems have been proposed and investigated. One such structure system is a steel-reinforced concrete shear wall, which has certain desirable properties such as good load-bearing capacity, stiffness, and seismic performance. This paper proposes an M-section cold-formed thin-walled steel reinforced concrete (MCTSR) shear wall, which uses M-section cold-formed thin-walled steel to function as reinforcements. Six specimens with different permanent formwork types, axial compression ratios, reinforcement diameters, and other parameters were tested under cyclic loading to investigate seismic performance. The results demonstrate that various types of permanent formwork, including cement fibrolite plate, metal lathing, and polystyrene board can meet the requirement of related seismic design codes, construction demand, and assembly requirements, and have no obvious impact on the ultimate load-bearing capacity, lateral stiffness, and stiffness degradation rate. However, it changes the energy dissipation capacity and ductility, which are two important indexes to evaluate seismic performance in engineering practice. The failure mechanism and the influence of axial compression ratio, reinforcement diameter, and space between reinforcements are discussed. The shear-strength equations proposed by various countries’ or regions’ codes were analyzed, which can be used as a reference for related engineers and designers. Finite-element models for MCTSR shear walls were established for further investigation.
    publisherASCE
    titleSeismic Performance of M-Section Cold-Formed Thin-Walled Steel-Reinforced Concrete Wall
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume148
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003453
    journal fristpage04022144
    journal lastpage04022144-20
    page20
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian