YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Review of Critical Success Factors and Key Performance Indicators in Performance Assessment of P3 Transportation Projects

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 038 ):;issue: 005::page 04022045
    Author:
    Manik Ahmed
    ,
    Michael Garvin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001070
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: What is a successful public–private partnership (P3)? The existing literature has continued to explore critical success factors (CSFs), key performance indicators (KPIs), and P3 drivers that are linked to P3 performance and outcomes, but some fundamental variations remain in the use of such factors and metrics to assess P3s. Studies have characterized CSFs as the “ingredients” necessary for P3 success and KPIs as the “metrics” to evaluate P3 outcomes or performance. As work in the area has progressed, the literature has evolved to consider CSFs and KPIs more holistically by broadening the factors considered to encompass social, political, economic, and financial categories. These areas in the literature are rather distinct, yet CSFs and KPIs sometimes serve as substitutes for one another, because the definition of and classification between CSFs and KPIs lack clarity. To address this issue, this work characterizes and synthesizes the literature on CSFs and KPIs to identify how to employ these factors and metrics to assess various aspects of P3 performance in transportation projects. CSFs identified were grouped into six categories such as project planning and environment and lifecycle perspectives, while KPIs were combined into four categories such as project delivery and socioeconomic. This work updates prior literature reviews, which is an important contribution because papers addressing CSFs and KPIs in P3s have increased in the last several years. Additionally, the distinction between CSFs and KPIs is clarified, and knowledge gaps such as the relationships between CSFs and future areas of research are presented.
    • Download: (275.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Review of Critical Success Factors and Key Performance Indicators in Performance Assessment of P3 Transportation Projects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286466
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorManik Ahmed
    contributor authorMichael Garvin
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:20:49Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:20:49Z
    date issued2022/06/29
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0001070.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286466
    description abstractWhat is a successful public–private partnership (P3)? The existing literature has continued to explore critical success factors (CSFs), key performance indicators (KPIs), and P3 drivers that are linked to P3 performance and outcomes, but some fundamental variations remain in the use of such factors and metrics to assess P3s. Studies have characterized CSFs as the “ingredients” necessary for P3 success and KPIs as the “metrics” to evaluate P3 outcomes or performance. As work in the area has progressed, the literature has evolved to consider CSFs and KPIs more holistically by broadening the factors considered to encompass social, political, economic, and financial categories. These areas in the literature are rather distinct, yet CSFs and KPIs sometimes serve as substitutes for one another, because the definition of and classification between CSFs and KPIs lack clarity. To address this issue, this work characterizes and synthesizes the literature on CSFs and KPIs to identify how to employ these factors and metrics to assess various aspects of P3 performance in transportation projects. CSFs identified were grouped into six categories such as project planning and environment and lifecycle perspectives, while KPIs were combined into four categories such as project delivery and socioeconomic. This work updates prior literature reviews, which is an important contribution because papers addressing CSFs and KPIs in P3s have increased in the last several years. Additionally, the distinction between CSFs and KPIs is clarified, and knowledge gaps such as the relationships between CSFs and future areas of research are presented.
    publisherASCE
    titleReview of Critical Success Factors and Key Performance Indicators in Performance Assessment of P3 Transportation Projects
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume38
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001070
    journal fristpage04022045
    journal lastpage04022045-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 038 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian