YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparative Study of DWT and EEMD Methods for Validation and Correction of Pyroshock Data

    Source: Journal of Aerospace Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 005::page 04022061
    Author:
    Xixiong Wang
    ,
    Yu Qi
    ,
    Zhen Li
    ,
    Zhaoye Qin
    ,
    Tao Yu
    ,
    Jifeng Ding
    ,
    Fulei Chu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001458
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Low-frequency errors are a type of testing errors commonly existing in pyroshock experiments due to the harsh mechanical environment that lead to inaccuracy and contamination of pyroshock data. It is necessary to eliminate such low-frequency errors from pyroshock data via data analysis. Two methods based on discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) are proposed, respectively, in this article. Firstly, the principle and operating process of these two methods are introduced, where four correlation coefficients are defined to determine the decomposition level for quantitative correction. Then, the two methods are applied to remove the integral zero shift from a set of pyroshock test data, respectively, and the capability and effectiveness of the two methods are compared. It is revealed from the comparison studies that both methods are capable of removing integral zero shift effectively to correct the shock response spectrum and improve the accuracy of pyroshock data. The correlation coefficients constructed here can help to realize quantitative selection of key parameters for the two methods. The DWT method shows better correction performance for extracting accurate parameters, whereas the EEMD method is more concise and convenient for application.
    • Download: (2.373Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparative Study of DWT and EEMD Methods for Validation and Correction of Pyroshock Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286332
    Collections
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorXixiong Wang
    contributor authorYu Qi
    contributor authorZhen Li
    contributor authorZhaoye Qin
    contributor authorTao Yu
    contributor authorJifeng Ding
    contributor authorFulei Chu
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:16:29Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:16:29Z
    date issued2022/05/27
    identifier other%28ASCE%29AS.1943-5525.0001458.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286332
    description abstractLow-frequency errors are a type of testing errors commonly existing in pyroshock experiments due to the harsh mechanical environment that lead to inaccuracy and contamination of pyroshock data. It is necessary to eliminate such low-frequency errors from pyroshock data via data analysis. Two methods based on discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) are proposed, respectively, in this article. Firstly, the principle and operating process of these two methods are introduced, where four correlation coefficients are defined to determine the decomposition level for quantitative correction. Then, the two methods are applied to remove the integral zero shift from a set of pyroshock test data, respectively, and the capability and effectiveness of the two methods are compared. It is revealed from the comparison studies that both methods are capable of removing integral zero shift effectively to correct the shock response spectrum and improve the accuracy of pyroshock data. The correlation coefficients constructed here can help to realize quantitative selection of key parameters for the two methods. The DWT method shows better correction performance for extracting accurate parameters, whereas the EEMD method is more concise and convenient for application.
    publisherASCE
    titleA Comparative Study of DWT and EEMD Methods for Validation and Correction of Pyroshock Data
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume35
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Aerospace Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001458
    journal fristpage04022061
    journal lastpage04022061-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Aerospace Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian